AreaIndex
MenuClose

Town guide · Town · England

Chandler's Ford

Town642 figures

Explore house prices and housing, home energy and crime and safety in Chandler's Ford. This local area guide brings together 642 published figures for this town in England, with the source and date shown for each.

Area snapshot

The first facts to orient a home search

Every figure keeps the geography and source it was published for.

Tip: select the star on any figure to pin it here for comparing across topics.

How Chandler's Ford compares nationwide

Chandler's FordNationwide

Each line runs from one value to the other, so the gap is easy to see. Higher and lower describe the number only, not whether it is better or worse.

  • £120 below Average across published towns and cities in England

    £2,342£2,462

  • 134.881 above Average across published towns and cities in England

    2,0771,942.119

  • £105,697 above Average across published towns and cities in England

    £400,000£294,303

  • 18.1 percentage points below Average across published towns and cities in England

    50.6%68.7%

  • £80 below Average across published towns and cities in England

    £1,561£1,641

  • £239 below Average across published towns and cities in England

    £4,684£4,924

  • 6.5 percentage points below Average across published towns and cities in England

    1.4%7.9%

  • In line with Average across published towns and cities in England

    83.7%82.1%

  • £122,032 above Average across published towns and cities in England

    £560,000£437,968

  • £72,922 above Average across published towns and cities in England

    £370,000£297,078

Everyday services, by straight-line distance

  • 200 m
  • 850 m
  • 150 m
  • 450 m
  • 350 m

The scale is logarithmic, with marks at 100 m, 1 km and 10 km.

What different homes have been selling for

  • £560,000
  • £370,000
  • £315,000
  • Council tax Band D benchmark £2,342
  • Flood-warning area 300 m away

Explore this guide

Open a topic to see every figure

Choose a topic to see every available figure for this location. If a source should cover this area but has no figure, we say so rather than showing zero.

What stands out nationally

Figures in the highest or lowest tenth of their published comparison group. Higher and lower describe the number only, not whether it is better or worse.

Crime & emergency services · Lower than most

Recorded crimes per 1,000 residents per year

27.36 per 1,000 residents per year

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06

People & households · Lower than most

Residents aged under 15

12.3%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Lower than most

Residents aged 15 to 64

53.1%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Higher than most

Residents aged 65 and over

34.6%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Lower than most

Households with dependent children

19.3%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Higher than most

Owned outright

55.8%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Lower than most

Socially rented households

1.5%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

People & households · Lower than most

Overcrowded households

0.6%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Census 2021 · Census 2021

Air, land & environment · Higher than most

Relative elevation versus surrounding neighbourhood

11 m

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

OS Terrain 50 · 2026-07

Nature & green space · Lower than most

Public greenspace area

8.7 ha

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the lowest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

OS Open Greenspace · 2026-04

Nature & green space · Higher than most

Woodland area

1,775.2 ha

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

National Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024)

Schools & childcare · Higher than most

Primary schools

6

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Compare school performance data · 2024/25

Health & care · Higher than most

Recorded cancer prevalence at GP practice

6.1%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

Quality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25

Health & care · Higher than most

Overall experience of GP practice

91.2%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Health & care · Higher than most

Helpfulness of reception staff

95.8%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Health & care · Higher than most

Being listened to at the last appointment

97.2%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Health & care · Higher than most

Being involved in decisions about care

97.7%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Health & care · Higher than most

Experience of NHS services when the practice was closed

78.6%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Health & care · Higher than most

Survey response rate at the nearest practice

39.6%

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

GP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026

Shops, food & amenities · Higher than most

Count of schools

8

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

OpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23

Shops, food & amenities · Higher than most

Count of playgrounds

11

Compared with
Lowest tenthHighest tenth

Among the highest 10% of towns and cities in England.

Representative location

OpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23

What area does each figure describe?

Every figure belongs to one of these groups, so you always know whether you are reading about the whole place, a neighbourhood, or the wider council area.

  • 70

    Whole town

    Totals and figures for the town boundary

  • 42

    Neighbourhood range

    Lowest, median and highest across local areas

  • 443

    Around the centre

    A representative location in the town

  • 87

    Wider council area

    Named council areas around the town

How these figures were made

The small numbers after figure labels refer to this key. They show how a figure was made, not how accurate it is. Open any figure to see its source, date and important limits.

  1. Published figureTaken directly from the named source.
  2. Combined recordsSeveral published records combined into one total, average or summary.
  3. Model estimateEstimated by a model rather than measured at this postcode.
  4. Calculated from a mapWorked out by matching this postcode to features on a published map.

Council Air Quality Management Areas

Published council-wide context for councils linked to Chandler's Ford, not a finding about the whole place or a property.

These records are published for councils linked to known active postcodes in this place. The councils cover a wider area: a listed designation is not a finding that it intersects this town or any property. The list may not be exhaustive. AQMAs are management designations, not measured pollution concentrations, property exposure or clean-air charging zones. Absence of a designation is not evidence of clean air. Great Britain only; Northern Ireland mapping is not included.

Register snapshot: 2026-10-20. Imported 25 October 2026.

Defra and devolved administrations / Ricardo / local authorities · 2026-10-20Show source and date
Source
Air Quality Management Areas
Source release
Defra UK-AIR AQMA GB boundaries published 2026_10_20 [b0429a13ddb0aec2c63e07a61ca4d6b2d60edc49df028ca25c6993906b8e795a]
Area covered
Published records for known linked councils; not a Town intersection assessment
Data date
2026-10-20
Added to AreaIndex
25 October 2026
Reuse licence
Open Government Licence v3.0 (Great Britain only)
Source credit
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. AQMA data compiled by Ricardo on behalf of Defra and the devolved administrations from local authority reports. Contains Ordnance Survey (GB) data © Crown copyright and database right 2026; Royal Mail (GB) data © Royal Mail copyright and database right 2026; National Statistics (GB) data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, licensed under Defra’s Public Sector Mapping Agreement with Ordnance Survey (licence No. 100022861).
File fingerprint
b0429a13ddb0aec2c63e07a61ca4d6b2d60edc49df028ca25c6993906b8e795a

Mapped Nitrate Vulnerable Zone records

Named records from the publisher’s mapped dataset intersecting the official Chandler's Ford settlement outline, including boundary contact.

These are named records in the publisher’s mapped 2021 Nitrate Vulnerable Zones dataset whose polygons intersect this place’s current official mapped settlement outline, including boundary-only contact. This does not mean the whole town or any property is in a zone. NVZ rules concern agricultural land management, not household restrictions or a measurement of nitrate or drinking-water safety. Absence of a listed record is not evidence of clean water. Historical/type and status labels are reproduced without interpreting their current legal force. England only; separate Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish regimes are not represented.

Dataset reference period: 2021. Imported 19 October 2026.

Environment Agency / Defra · 2021Show source and date
Source
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones
Source release
Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZ) 2021 Designations, record updated 2026-09-18
Area covered
Published English polygons intersecting the official settlement outline, including boundary contact; not a whole-town or property finding
Data date
2021
Added to AreaIndex
19 October 2026
Reuse licence
Open Government Licence v3.0
Source credit
© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2023. All rights reserved. Derived in part from geological mapping data provided by the British Geological Survey © NERC. Derived in part from data provided by the National Soils Research Institute © Cranfield University. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2016. Derived in part from data provided by Defra © Crown 2016 copyright, the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology © NERC, and UK Water Companies.
File fingerprint
2eca764a13e4bfc544d6ad73c51a1a7b634ad6983ddca41763be39c14b575222

Mapped groundwater source protection categories

Original published categories whose polygons intersect the official Chandler's Ford settlement outline, including boundary contact.

These are original category codes and definitions from the retained Source Protection Zones (Merged) dataset whose polygons intersect this place’s official mapped settlement outline, including boundary-only contact. This is not a whole-town or property designation, a finding about a drinking-water supply, or evidence of contamination, water quality or risk. These definitions do not identify individual supplies. Dataset dates do not establish current legal status. Absence of a listed category does not establish that land or a property is outside a zone. England only; separate Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish regimes are not represented. Precautionary groundwater abstraction and land-use designation at a postcode centroid, not an address-level finding or drinking-water quality result. Outside a mapped zone does not establish clean or unprotected groundwater. Welsh zones and the separate Scottish and Northern Irish regimes are not represented.

Dataset reference period: 2026-03-06. Downloaded 19 October 2026. Imported 19 October 2026.

Environment Agency · 2026-03-06Show source and date
Source
Groundwater Source Protection Zones
Source release
Environment Agency Source Protection Zones (Merged), catalogue updated 2026-09-18T14:48:13.047442 [944183eb46c5988c07824435de126dbe1684953cae7e4fb6a44dcd2f4d094b4c]
Area covered
Published English category polygons intersecting the official settlement outline, including boundary contact; not a whole-town, property or water-supply finding
Data date
2026-03-06
Added to AreaIndex
19 October 2026
Reuse licence
Open Government Licence v3.0
Source credit
© Environment Agency copyright and/or database right 2016. All rights reserved.
File fingerprint
944183eb46c5988c07824435de126dbe1684953cae7e4fb6a44dcd2f4d094b4c

Broadband and mobile connectivity

Broadband and mobile coverage around Chandler's Ford

Ofcom publishes these fixed-broadband, full-fibre take-up and mobile coverage profiles for named local and unitary authorities, rather than for town boundaries. They are shown as wider council-area context for Chandler's Ford; availability figures are provider predictions, not measurements at every address.

Fixed broadband across all premises in the wider council area

Eastleigh — All premises
63,831
Eastleigh — Premises matched to provider data
63,783
Eastleigh — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
98.7%
Eastleigh — 100 Mbit/s availability
91.4%
Eastleigh — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
90.6%
Eastleigh — Full-fibre availability
71.6%
Eastleigh — Gigabit availability
90.3%
Eastleigh — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0%
Eastleigh — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
58,355
Test Valley — All premises
62,034
Test Valley — Premises matched to provider data
61,923
Test Valley — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
95.6%
Test Valley — 100 Mbit/s availability
76%
Test Valley — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
75.8%
Test Valley — Full-fibre availability
58%
Test Valley — Gigabit availability
75.6%
Test Valley — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0.3%
Test Valley — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
47,151
Winchester — All premises
61,397
Winchester — Premises matched to provider data
61,246
Winchester — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
94.8%
Winchester — 100 Mbit/s availability
70%
Winchester — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
69.6%
Winchester — Full-fibre availability
58.4%
Winchester — Gigabit availability
69.3%
Winchester — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0.3%
Winchester — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
42,961

Fixed broadband across residential premises in the wider council area

Eastleigh — All premises
61,269
Eastleigh — Premises matched to provider data
61,261
Eastleigh — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
99.3%
Eastleigh — 100 Mbit/s availability
92.8%
Eastleigh — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
92.1%
Eastleigh — Full-fibre availability
72.5%
Eastleigh — Gigabit availability
91.9%
Eastleigh — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0%
Eastleigh — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
56,873
Test Valley — All premises
58,137
Test Valley — Premises matched to provider data
58,114
Test Valley — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
96.5%
Test Valley — 100 Mbit/s availability
79.1%
Test Valley — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
78.8%
Test Valley — Full-fibre availability
60.2%
Test Valley — Gigabit availability
78.7%
Test Valley — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0.3%
Test Valley — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
45,958
Winchester — All premises
57,470
Winchester — Premises matched to provider data
57,359
Winchester — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s)
95.6%
Winchester — 100 Mbit/s availability
71.8%
Winchester — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s)
71.4%
Winchester — Full-fibre availability
59.7%
Winchester — Gigabit availability
71%
Winchester — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access
0.3%
Winchester — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability
41,249

Full-fibre take-up across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage
54%
Eastleigh — Full-fibre take-up across all premises
45%
Test Valley — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage
52%
Test Valley — Full-fibre take-up across all premises
30%
Winchester — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage
36%
Winchester — Full-fibre take-up across all premises
21%

Coverage data basis across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Premises used as the coverage basis
63,870
Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis
7,984
Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads
736
Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways
216
Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads
520
Test Valley — Premises used as the coverage basis
62,117
Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis
62,748
Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads
2,764
Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways
227
Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads
2,286
Winchester — Premises used as the coverage basis
61,679
Winchester — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis
66,111
Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads
2,838
Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways
363
Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads
1,734

2G coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0.03%
Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 3 networks
95.96%
Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 3 networks
67.66%
Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks
93.22%
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0.21%
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 3 networks
89.53%
Test Valley — Premises indoors · 3 networks
56%
Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks
77.37%
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0.34%
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 3 networks
95.5%
Winchester — Premises indoors · 3 networks
66.13%
Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks
78.56%

3G coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
Not published
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
Not published
Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks
Not published
Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
Not published
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
Not published
Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks
Not published
Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
Not published

4G coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
99.88%
Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks
95.04%
Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
99.67%
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0%
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
98.39%
Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks
81.87%
Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
93.08%
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
98.68%
Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks
87.73%
Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
91.17%

Mobile voice coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
99.98%
Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks
98.82%
Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
99.76%
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
99.05%
Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks
86.14%
Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
95.43%
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks
99.21%
Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks
90.06%
Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks
93.47%

5G coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
Not published
Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
85.04%
Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0.15%
Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
38.84%
Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
7.94%
Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
49.23%
Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
12.05%
Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
14.74%
Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
7.71%
Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
51.89%
Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
11.53%
Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks
18.54%

Standalone 5G coverage across the wider council area

Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
0.05%
Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
83.35%
Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
6.04%
Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
24.52%
Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
20.09%
Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
9.11%
Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
38.44%
Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
3.64%
Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
18.31%
Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
38.37%
Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks
33.11%
Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks
14.52%

These highlights come from complete all-premises and residential broadband profiles, both published full-fibre take-up measures, the complete 2G, 3G, 4G, voice, 5G and standalone-5G network-count profiles, and the premises and grid-pixel counts used as the mobile basis. View every published broadband, full-fibre and mobile value.

Published source details for this wider council-area context:

  • Source
    Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · Ofcom
    Release
    Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed coverage (sha256:7a4b4a32a6d1982185c55d611d38e8547eb8d731a4b3282908ab9dc2cde27c42)
    Data date
    January 2026
    Licence
    Open Government Licence v3.0
    Source credit
    Source: Ofcom, Connected Nations Spring 2026. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Published figures642 stats available

642 sourced figures are listed here with the source, period and geography. Open a topic above for comparisons and detailed explanations.

Location & geography

  • Income deprivation classification: Lower deprivationONS grouping based on the relative income deprivation of the townUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · ONS towns classification, May 2026 · Published town figure
  • Coastal classification: Non-coastalWhether ONS classifies this built-up area as coastalUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · ONS towns classification, May 2026 · Published town figure
  • Town size group: MediumONS size group based on Census 2021 population on the 2024 boundaryUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · 2021 population on 2024 built-up-area geography · Published town figure

Homes & housing costs

  • Bedrooms: 1 bedroom: 29; 2 bedrooms: 304; 3 bedrooms: 291; 4 or more bedrooms: 169Published information about bedrooms for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Detached homes: Highest — Test Valley 014A: 91.6%; Median: 52.2%; Lowest — Eastleigh 006E: 3.9%Published information about detached homes for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Flats and maisonettes: Highest — Eastleigh 003E: 38.4%; Median: 6.3%; Lowest — Test Valley 014A: 0.2%Published information about flats and maisonettes for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Semi-detached homes: Highest — Eastleigh 002B: 40.8%; Median: 22.9%; Lowest — Test Valley 014A: 2.2%Published information about semi-detached homes for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Terraced homes: Highest — Eastleigh 002A: 51.3%; Median: 10.6%; Lowest — Eastleigh 001A: 1.7%Published information about terraced homes for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Average house price: Eastleigh: £307,883; Test Valley: £370,329; Winchester: £476,639Across the whole local authorityUK House Price Index · 2026-05 · Named wider-area context
  • Median sale price: £435,000Median house price across transactions in the built-up areaUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · 2023 · Published town figure
  • Annual house price change: Eastleigh: 0.0%; Test Valley: 0.5%; Winchester: 3.1%Change over the previous 12 monthsUK House Price Index · 2026-05 · Named wider-area context
  • Median sale price change, 2001 to 2023: 210.7%Change in the published median house price over the periodUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · 2001 to 2023 · Published town figure
  • Monthly sales volume: Eastleigh: 140; Test Valley: 117; Winchester: 106Transactions registered in the local authorityUK House Price Index · 2026-03 · Named wider-area context
  • Band D benchmark for local authority: £2,342The council tax on a Band D home in this council areaCouncil Tax bands and local charges · 2026-27 · Representative location
  • Registered sales over the last five years: 2,077Standard residential sale registrationsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Median sale price over the last five years: £400,000Across standard residential sales in this postcodePrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Most common council tax band in this neighbourhood: CThe band the most homes here sit inCouncil Tax bands and local charges · 2026-27 · Representative location
  • Latest recorded sale: £300,000Price of the most recent registered salePrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Share of homes in bands A to C: 50.6%The three lowest bands, as a share of all homes hereCouncil Tax bands and local charges · 2026-27 · Representative location
  • Council tax in the lowest band: £1,561The annual charge on a Band A home in this council areaCouncil Tax bands and local charges · 2026-27 · Representative location
  • Latest recorded sale date: 21 July 2026Completion date of the most recent registered salePrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Council tax in the highest band: £4,684The annual charge on a top-band home in this council areaCouncil Tax bands and local charges · 2026-27 · Representative location
  • New-build transaction share: 1.4%Of standard sales in the last five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Freehold transaction share: 83.7%Of standard sales in the last five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Detached median sale price: £560,000Registered detached sales over five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Semi-detached median sale price: £370,000Registered semi-detached sales over five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Terraced median sale price: £315,000Registered terraced sales over five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Average monthly private rent: Eastleigh: £1,214; Test Valley: £1,234; Winchester: £1,505Modelled rent level across the local authorityPrice Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Flat and maisonette median sale price: £210,000Registered flat and maisonette sales over five yearsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Homes by accommodation type: Caravan, mobile or temporary home: 95 (0.7%); Detached house or bungalow: 6,885 (51.1%); Flat, maisonette or apartment: 1,830 (13.6%); Semi-detached house or bungalow: 2,585 (19.2%); Terraced house or bungalow: 2,090 (15.5%)Households grouped by their accommodation typeTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Annual private rent inflation: Eastleigh: 3.4%; Test Valley: 8.4%; Winchester: 3.8%Change over the previous twelve monthsPrice Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Homes by tenure: Mortgage, loan or shared ownership: 4,845 (37.0%); Owned outright: 5,625 (42.9%); Private rented or rent free: 1,590 (12.1%); Social rented: 1,050 (8.0%)Households grouped by ownership or renting tenureTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Registered sales in the last 12 months: 368Standard residential sale registrationsPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Mean sale price in the last 12 months: £443,296Arithmetic mean of registered standard residential salesPrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Change in private rents (index): Eastleigh: 122.191; Test Valley: 120.482; Winchester: 123.636January 2023 = 100Price Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Average rent by property type: Eastleigh — Detached: £1,636; Eastleigh — Semi-detached: £1,334; Eastleigh — Terraced: £1,212; Eastleigh — Flat: £1,020; Test Valley — Detached: £1,736; Test Valley — Semi-detached: £1,366; Test Valley — Terraced: £1,256; Test Valley — Flat: £984; Winchester — Detached: £2,015; Winchester — Semi-detached: £1,697; Winchester — Terraced: £1,553; Winchester — Flat: £1,209Detached, semi-detached, terraced and flatsPrice Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Lowest sale price in the last 12 months: £75,250Lowest registered standard residential salePrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Average rent by bedroom count: Eastleigh — 1 bed: £861; Eastleigh — 2 bed: £1,111; Eastleigh — 3 bed: £1,361; Eastleigh — 4+ bed: £1,869; Test Valley — 1 bed: £887; Test Valley — 2 bed: £1,142; Test Valley — 3 bed: £1,406; Test Valley — 4+ bed: £1,999; Winchester — 1 bed: £1,015; Winchester — 2 bed: £1,316; Winchester — 3 bed: £1,620; Winchester — 4+ bed: £2,245One, two, three and four or more bedroomsPrice Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Highest sale price in the last 12 months: £1,300,000Highest registered standard residential salePrice Paid Data · July 2026 · Exact town total
  • Private rent trend over five years: Eastleigh: 30.8%; Test Valley: 27.2%; Winchester: 34.5%Change against the same month five years earlierPrice Index of Private Rents (PIPR) · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Median house price to workplace-based earnings ratio: Eastleigh: 8.85; Test Valley: 9.36; Winchester: 10.65Years of local full-time earnings to buy a median-priced homeHousing affordability in England and Wales · 2025 · Named wider-area context
  • Median house price to residence-based earnings ratio: Eastleigh: 8.13; Test Valley: 9; Winchester: 10.05Years of residents’ full-time earnings to buy a median-priced homeHousing affordability in England and Wales · 2025 · Named wider-area context
  • Home-price-to-income ratio for lower-cost homes: Eastleigh: 8.48; Test Valley: 9.37; Winchester: 10.76Cheaper homes against lower-quartile earningsHousing affordability in England and Wales · 2025 · Named wider-area context
  • Affordability trend over ten years: Eastleigh: 4.5%; Test Valley: 3.8%; Winchester: -3.4%Change in the workplace-based ratio against ten years earlierHousing affordability in England and Wales · 2025 · Named wider-area context

Home energy certificates

  • Typical Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) band: DThe commonest current band on certificates in this postcodeEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Median energy-efficiency score: 68Median SAP score across certificates in this postcodeEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) mix in this postcode: D: 5; E: 1Every band present on certificates here, with countsEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Representative location
  • Typical potential Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) band: BThe band these properties could reach with the recommended workEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Median potential score: 81Median SAP score after the recommended improvementsEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Typical improvement headroom: 13 pointsMedian gap between current and potential scoreEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Typical floor area: 86 m²Median certificated floor area in this postcodeEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Floor-area profile: Middle half 56–86 m², median 74 m²The middle half of certificated floor areas hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Representative location
  • Typical construction age: 1950-1966The commonest construction age band on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Construction-age mix: 1950-1966: 5; 1967-1975: 1The three commonest age bands on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Representative location
  • Wall construction: Cavity wallThe commonest wall construction on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Walls recorded as insulated: 79.8%Share of classifiable certificates recording wall insulationEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Roof construction: PitchedThe commonest roof construction on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Roofs recorded as insulated: 95.6%Share of classifiable certificates recording roof insulationEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Window glazing: Fully double glazedThe commonest glazing recorded on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Main heating system: Boiler and radiatorsThe commonest main heating system on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Heating-system mix: Boiler and radiators 6The three commonest heating systems on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Representative location
  • Main heating fuel: mains gas (not community)The commonest heating fuel on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • On mains gas: 90.4%Share of certificates here connected to mains gasEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Secondary heating: NoneThe commonest secondary heating on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Hot-water system: From main systemThe commonest hot-water system on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Low-energy lighting: 77.0%Median share of fixed light fittings that are low-energyEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Certificates recording solar panels: 1.6%Share of certificates here recording photovoltaic panelsEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Modelled energy use: 203 kWh/m²/yrMedian modelled primary energy per square metre per yearEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Modelled CO₂ emissions: 3.3 t/yrMedian modelled CO₂ per year across certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Modelled heating cost: £624 a yearMedian modelled annual heating cost on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Modelled hot-water cost: £139 a yearMedian modelled annual hot-water cost on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total
  • Modelled lighting cost: £84 a yearMedian modelled annual lighting cost on certificates hereEnergy Performance of Buildings data · Lodgements to 2026-08-17 · Exact town total

Broadband & mobile

  • Fixed broadband across all premises in the wider council area: Eastleigh — All premises: 63,831; Eastleigh — Premises matched to provider data: 63,783; Eastleigh — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 98.7%; Eastleigh — 100 Mbit/s availability: 91.4%; Eastleigh — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 90.6%; Eastleigh — Full-fibre availability: 71.6%; Eastleigh — Gigabit availability: 90.3%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 0.1%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 1.2%; Eastleigh — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0%; Eastleigh — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 99.5%; Eastleigh — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Eastleigh — Premises with superfast availability: 63,031; Eastleigh — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 58,355; Eastleigh — Premises with ultrafast availability: 57,849; Eastleigh — Premises with full-fibre availability: 45,683; Eastleigh — Premises with gigabit availability: 57,620; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 3; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 28; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 83; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 752; Eastleigh — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 1; Eastleigh — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 63,487; Eastleigh — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Eastleigh — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 8.1%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 90.6%; Eastleigh — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0.1%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 1%; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 5,182; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 57,849; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 3; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 25; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 55; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 669; Test Valley — All premises: 62,034; Test Valley — Premises matched to provider data: 61,923; Test Valley — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 95.6%; Test Valley — 100 Mbit/s availability: 76%; Test Valley — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 75.8%; Test Valley — Full-fibre availability: 58%; Test Valley — Gigabit availability: 75.6%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0.2%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0.6%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 1.3%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 4.2%; Test Valley — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0.3%; Test Valley — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 99.1%; Test Valley — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Test Valley — Premises with superfast availability: 59,305; Test Valley — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 47,151; Test Valley — Premises with ultrafast availability: 47,002; Test Valley — Premises with full-fibre availability: 35,954; Test Valley — Premises with gigabit availability: 46,885; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 146; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 391; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 781; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 2,618; Test Valley — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 193; Test Valley — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 61,453; Test Valley — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Test Valley — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 19.8%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 75.8%; Test Valley — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0.2%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0.6%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 3%; Test Valley — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 12,303; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 47,002; Test Valley — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 146; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 245; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 390; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 1,837; Winchester — All premises: 61,397; Winchester — Premises matched to provider data: 61,246; Winchester — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 94.8%; Winchester — 100 Mbit/s availability: 70%; Winchester — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 69.6%; Winchester — Full-fibre availability: 58.4%; Winchester — Gigabit availability: 69.3%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0.9%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 1.7%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 4.9%; Winchester — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0.3%; Winchester — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 98.5%; Winchester — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Winchester — Premises with superfast availability: 58,224; Winchester — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 42,961; Winchester — Premises with ultrafast availability: 42,710; Winchester — Premises with full-fibre availability: 35,867; Winchester — Premises with gigabit availability: 42,521; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 243; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 580; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 1,027; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 3,022; Winchester — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 205; Winchester — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 60,450; Winchester — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Winchester — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 25.3%; Winchester — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 69.6%; Winchester — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Winchester — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0.5%; Winchester — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0.7%; Winchester — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 3.2%; Winchester — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 15,514; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 42,710; Winchester — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 243; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 337; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 447; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 1,995Ofcom all-premises fixed coverage, coverage-gap and download-speed-band percentages with their premise counts.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Fixed broadband across residential premises in the wider council area: Eastleigh — All premises: 61,269; Eastleigh — Premises matched to provider data: 61,261; Eastleigh — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 99.3%; Eastleigh — 100 Mbit/s availability: 92.8%; Eastleigh — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 92.1%; Eastleigh — Full-fibre availability: 72.5%; Eastleigh — Gigabit availability: 91.9%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 0.7%; Eastleigh — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0%; Eastleigh — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 99.8%; Eastleigh — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Eastleigh — Premises with superfast availability: 60,836; Eastleigh — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 56,873; Eastleigh — Premises with ultrafast availability: 56,429; Eastleigh — Premises with full-fibre availability: 44,418; Eastleigh — Premises with gigabit availability: 56,283; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 1; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 16; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 22; Eastleigh — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 425; Eastleigh — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0; Eastleigh — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 61,126; Eastleigh — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Eastleigh — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 7.2%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 92.1%; Eastleigh — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0%; Eastleigh — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 0.7%; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 4,407; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 56,429; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 1; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 15; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 6; Eastleigh — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 403; Test Valley — All premises: 58,137; Test Valley — Premises matched to provider data: 58,114; Test Valley — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 96.5%; Test Valley — 100 Mbit/s availability: 79.1%; Test Valley — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 78.8%; Test Valley — Full-fibre availability: 60.2%; Test Valley — Gigabit availability: 78.7%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0.2%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0.5%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 1%; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 3.5%; Test Valley — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0.3%; Test Valley — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 99.4%; Test Valley — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Test Valley — Premises with superfast availability: 56,092; Test Valley — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 45,958; Test Valley — Premises with ultrafast availability: 45,840; Test Valley — Premises with full-fibre availability: 34,989; Test Valley — Premises with gigabit availability: 45,741; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 123; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 297; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 585; Test Valley — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 2,022; Test Valley — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 153; Test Valley — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 57,793; Test Valley — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Test Valley — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 17.6%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 78.8%; Test Valley — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0.2%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0.3%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0.5%; Test Valley — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 2.5%; Test Valley — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 10,252; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 45,840; Test Valley — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 123; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 174; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 288; Test Valley — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 1,437; Winchester — All premises: 57,470; Winchester — Premises matched to provider data: 57,359; Winchester — Superfast availability (at least 30 Mbit/s): 95.6%; Winchester — 100 Mbit/s availability: 71.8%; Winchester — Ultrafast availability (at least 300 Mbit/s): 71.4%; Winchester — Full-fibre availability: 59.7%; Winchester — Gigabit availability: 71%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 0.8%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 1.4%; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 4.2%; Winchester — Unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 0.3%; Winchester — Next-generation access (NGA) availability: 98.8%; Winchester — Able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0%; Winchester — Premises with superfast availability: 54,960; Winchester — Premises with 100 Mbit/s availability: 41,249; Winchester — Premises with ultrafast availability: 41,010; Winchester — Premises with full-fibre availability: 34,286; Winchester — Premises with gigabit availability: 40,825; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 2 Mbit/s: 208; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 5 Mbit/s: 463; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 10 Mbit/s: 777; Winchester — Matched premises unable to receive 30 Mbit/s: 2,399; Winchester — Premises unable to receive decent broadband from fixed or fixed wireless access: 175; Winchester — Premises with next-generation access (NGA): 56,776; Winchester — Premises able to receive decent broadband from fixed wireless access: 0; Winchester — Download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 24.3%; Winchester — Download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 71.4%; Winchester — Download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Winchester — Download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 0.4%; Winchester — Download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 0.5%; Winchester — Download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 2.8%; Winchester — Premises with download speed over 30 and below 300 Mbit/s: 13,950; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 300 Mbit/s: 41,010; Winchester — Premises with download speed over 0 and below 2 Mbit/s: 208; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 2 and below 5 Mbit/s: 255; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 5 and below 10 Mbit/s: 314; Winchester — Premises with download speed at least 10 and below 30 Mbit/s: 1,622Ofcom residential fixed coverage, coverage-gap and download-speed-band percentages with their premise counts.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Full-fibre take-up across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage: 54%; Eastleigh — Full-fibre take-up across all premises: 45%; Test Valley — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage: 52%; Test Valley — Full-fibre take-up across all premises: 30%; Winchester — Full-fibre take-up among premises with full-fibre coverage: 36%; Winchester — Full-fibre take-up across all premises: 21%Ofcom full-fibre take-up as a percentage of premises covered by full fibre and as a percentage of all premises.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Coverage data basis across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Premises used as the coverage basis: 63,870; Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis: 7,984; Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads: 736; Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways: 216; Eastleigh — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads: 520; Test Valley — Premises used as the coverage basis: 62,117; Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis: 62,748; Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads: 2,764; Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways: 227; Test Valley — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads: 2,286; Winchester — Premises used as the coverage basis: 61,679; Winchester — 100 m grid pixels used as the geographic coverage basis: 66,111; Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing A or B roads: 2,838; Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways: 363; Winchester — 100 m grid pixels containing motorways or A roads: 1,734Ofcom counts of premises and 100 m grid pixels used as the basis for the authority coverage percentages, including road and motorway subsets.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • 2G coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0.03%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.03%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 3.98%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 95.96%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 1.78%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 1 network: 2.71%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 27.84%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 67.66%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.01%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 0.2%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 6.56%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 93.22%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 1.9%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 2.99%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 23.51%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 71.6%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: 23.15%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 76.85%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 22.12%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 77.88%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0.21%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.44%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 9.82%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 89.53%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 3.59%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 1 network: 6.29%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 34.12%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 56%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 1.02%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 4.09%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 17.52%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 77.37%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 5.39%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 10.06%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 29.38%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 55.17%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: 32.16%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 67.84%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 2.97%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 6.43%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 29.97%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 60.63%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0.34%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.6%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 3.55%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 95.5%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 2.82%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 1 network: 5.17%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 25.88%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 66.13%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 2.78%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 4.75%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 13.91%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 78.56%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 7.05%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 9.73%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 23.75%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 59.48%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 1 network: 4.13%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: 19.56%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 76.31%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 3.23%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 4.67%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 21.74%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 70.36%Ofcom percentages by exact number of networks for premises, geography and major-road coverage.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • 3G coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 100%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 100%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.32%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 1 network: 99.68%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.02%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 99.98%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.54%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 99.46%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 1 network: 100%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.26%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 99.74%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 100%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.59%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 1 network: 99.41%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises indoors · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.01%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 99.99%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 1.27%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 98.73%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 1 network: 100%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.29%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 99.71%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: Not publishedOfcom percentages by exact number of networks for premises, geography and major-road coverage.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • 4G coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 0.12%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 99.88%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.03%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 1 network: 0.13%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 0.36%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 4.44%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 95.04%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 0.33%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 99.67%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.14%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 0.54%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 0.95%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 4.48%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 93.89%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 1.85%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 98.15%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 2.31%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 97.69%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.07%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 0.15%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 1.38%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 98.39%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.52%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 1 network: 1.67%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 4.06%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 11.88%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 81.87%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.08%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 0.38%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 1.28%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 5.18%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 93.08%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.51%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 2.46%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 5.86%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 16.86%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 74.31%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 7.05%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 92.95%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.13%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 0.92%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 4.16%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 13.87%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 80.93%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.2%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 0.22%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 0.9%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 98.68%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.59%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 1 network: 1.91%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 2.45%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 7.33%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 87.73%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.02%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 1.73%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 2.3%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 4.78%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 91.17%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.81%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 5%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 5.85%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 11.73%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 76.6%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: 0.83%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 1.1%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 98.07%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.12%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 1.85%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 2.83%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 8.82%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 86.39%Ofcom percentages by exact number of networks for indoor and outdoor premises, geography and major roads.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Mobile voice coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 0.02%; Eastleigh — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 99.98%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 1 network: 0.03%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 0.18%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 0.97%; Eastleigh — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 98.82%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 0.24%; Eastleigh — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 99.76%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 0.27%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 0.41%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 2.85%; Eastleigh — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 96.47%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 1.85%; Eastleigh — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 98.15%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 1.54%; Eastleigh — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 98.46%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 0.08%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 0.87%; Test Valley — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 99.05%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.13%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 1 network: 0.49%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 2.64%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 10.61%; Test Valley — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 86.14%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 0.11%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 0.57%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 3.89%; Test Valley — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 95.43%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.14%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 0.65%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 3.94%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 13.97%; Test Valley — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 81.3%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 6.61%; Test Valley — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 93.39%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 0.22%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 1.97%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 10.76%; Test Valley — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 87.05%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 1 network: Not published; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 0.23%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 0.57%; Winchester — Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 99.21%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 0 networks: 0.13%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 1 network: 0.85%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 2 networks: 2.37%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 3 networks: 6.59%; Winchester — Premises indoors · 4 networks: 90.06%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 0.03%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 2.05%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 4.45%; Winchester — Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 93.47%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 0 networks: 0.25%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 1 network: 1.55%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 2 networks: 5.81%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 3 networks: 10.47%; Winchester — A and B roads in-car · 4 networks: 81.92%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 1 network: Not published; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 2 networks: 0.55%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 3 networks: 1.1%; Winchester — Motorways in-car · 4 networks: 98.35%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 0 networks: Not published; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 1 network: 0.23%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 2 networks: 2.6%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 3 networks: 5.71%; Winchester — Motorways and A roads in-car · 4 networks: 91.46%Ofcom percentages by exact number of networks for indoor and outdoor premises, geography and major roads.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • 5G coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 0.01%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 2.12%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 12.83%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 85.04%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 0.03%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 3.69%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 18.37%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 77.91%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0.15%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 2.48%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 19.51%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 39.02%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 38.84%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.59%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 3.57%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 23.21%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 39.78%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 32.85%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 7.94%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 3.34%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 11.64%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 27.85%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 49.23%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 26.71%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 19.16%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 21.62%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 18.07%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 14.45%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 12.05%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 10.63%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 30.24%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 32.34%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 14.74%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 44.29%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 25.99%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 17.86%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 8.01%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 3.85%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 7.71%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 7.02%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 8.79%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 24.6%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 51.89%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 16.57%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 20.16%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 22.65%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 20.55%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 20.06%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 11.53%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 17.05%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 26.15%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 26.74%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: 18.54%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 36.3%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 31.03%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 19.14%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 9.64%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: 3.9%Ofcom high-confidence and very-high-confidence outdoor 5G percentages by exact number of networks for premises and geography.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Standalone 5G coverage across the wider council area: Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 0.05%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 1.68%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 14.92%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 83.35%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 0.05%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 2.78%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 18.78%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 78.39%; Eastleigh — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 6.04%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 28.7%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 40.75%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 24.52%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 6.95%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 24.96%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 41.53%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 26.55%; Eastleigh — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 20.09%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 39.65%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 31.15%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 9.11%; Test Valley — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 46.37%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 32.26%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 16.79%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 4.58%; Test Valley — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 38.44%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 48.56%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 9.37%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 3.64%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 72.96%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 21.54%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 4.59%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 0.91%; Test Valley — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 18.31%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 12.87%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 30.45%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 38.37%; Winchester — High confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 37.05%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 24.11%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 20.91%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 17.93%; Winchester — High confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 0 networks: 33.11%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 1 network: 24.45%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 2 networks: 27.92%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 3 networks: 14.52%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Premises outdoors · 4 networks: Not published; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 0 networks: 65.41%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 1 network: 23.29%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 2 networks: 8.29%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 3 networks: 3.01%; Winchester — Very high confidence · Geographic outdoors · 4 networks: Not publishedOfcom high-confidence and very-high-confidence outdoor standalone-5G percentages by exact number of networks for premises and geography.Connected Nations Spring 2026 mobile and fixed broadband aggregates · January 2026 · Named wider-area context

Crime & emergency services

  • Recorded crimes: 437All categories, over the period we holdPolice.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Anti-social behaviour: 44The category recorded most often nearbyPolice.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Most common crime type: 181Largest single category of recorded crimePolice.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Bicycle theft: 4.0%Latest three months against the previous threePolice.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Change in recorded crime: 2.5%Most recent six months against the six beforePolice.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Local fire incidents: 0Fires attended in this neighbourhood in the yearFire and rescue incident statistics · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Fire casualties: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 86Non-fatal casualties across the fire and rescue authority in the yearFire and rescue incident statistics · 2025/26 · Named wider-area context
  • Fire fatalities: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 5Deaths in fires across the fire and rescue authority in the yearFire and rescue incident statistics · 2025/26 · Named wider-area context
  • Fire service response time indicator where published: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 10.45 minutesAverage time from call to the first vehicle arriving at a primary fire, across the whole authorityFire and rescue incident statistics · 2025/26 · Named wider-area context
  • Dwelling fires in this neighbourhood: 0Fires in homes attended here in the yearFire and rescue incident statistics · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Deliberate fires in this neighbourhood: 0Fires recorded as started on purpose here in the yearFire and rescue incident statistics · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Incidents attended by the fire service: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 19,118Everything the authority was called to in the year, including false alarmsFire and rescue incident statistics · 2025/26 · Named wider-area context
  • Dwelling fires per 100,000 people: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 36.3 per 100,000Home fires across the authority, scaled by its resident populationFire and rescue incident statistics · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Average response time to dwelling fires: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 9.14 minutesTime from call to the first vehicle arriving at a fire in a homeFire and rescue incident statistics · 2025/26 · Named wider-area context
  • Nearest fire station: Eastleigh (Hampshire and Isle of Wight)The closest station in a straight line, and the service that runs itFire stations · 2026 · Exact town total
  • Distance to nearest fire station: Inside the town boundaryStraight-line distance to the closest stationFire stations · 2026 · Exact town total
  • Fire stations within 5 km: 1How many stations are close byFire stations · 2026 · Exact town total
  • Fire stations in this fire and rescue authority: Hampshire and Isle of Wight: 61Stations operated across the whole authorityFire stations · 2026 · Named wider-area context
  • Crimes nearby, by direction and distance: 437 recorded incidents within 1,000 metres over 12 months. N, 0–250 m: 8; NE, 0–250 m: 0; E, 0–250 m: 0; SE, 0–250 m: 3; S, 0–250 m: 1; SW, 0–250 m: 0; W, 0–250 m: 4; NW, 0–250 m: 3; N, 250–500 m: 72; NE, 250–500 m: 25; E, 250–500 m: 1; SE, 250–500 m: 17; S, 250–500 m: 10; SW, 250–500 m: 4; W, 250–500 m: 13; NW, 250–500 m: 3; N, 500–750 m: 11; NE, 500–750 m: 2; E, 500–750 m: 13; SE, 500–750 m: 6; S, 500–750 m: 31; SW, 500–750 m: 25; W, 500–750 m: 70; NW, 500–750 m: 9; N, 750–1000 m: 5; NE, 750–1000 m: 10; E, 750–1000 m: 8; SE, 750–1000 m: 24; S, 750–1000 m: 27; SW, 750–1000 m: 6; W, 750–1000 m: 21; NW, 750–1000 m: 5Published information about crimes nearby, by direction and distance for the within 1 km.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Recorded crimes per 1,000 residents per year: 27.36 per 1,000 residents per yearPublished information about recorded crimes per 1,000 residents per year for the local neighbourhood.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Burglary: 17Published information about burglary for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Crime trend by month: Jul 2025: 27; Aug 2025: 32; Sep 2025: 29; Oct 2025: 34; Nov 2025: 43; Dec 2025: 31; Jan 2026: 53; Feb 2026: 30; Mar 2026: 36; Apr 2026: 36; May 2026: 34; Jun 2026: 52Published information about crime trend by month for the police force area.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Criminal damage and arson: 23Published information about criminal damage and arson for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Drugs: 10Published information about drugs for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Latest month: 52Published information about latest month for the police force area.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Other crime: 22Published information about other crime for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Other theft: 21Published information about other theft for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Outcomes for recorded offences: Investigation complete; no suspect identified: 142; Unable to prosecute suspect: 116; Under investigation: 47; No outcome recorded: 44; Awaiting court outcome: 25; Status update unavailable: 23; Action to be taken by another organisation: 19; Local resolution: 13; Offender given a caution: 4; Further investigation is not in the public interest: 2; Suspect charged as part of another case: 1; Court result unavailable: 1Published information about outcomes for recorded offences for the police force area.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Police force: Hampshire ConstabularyPublished information about police force for the police force area.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Possession of weapons: 4Published information about possession of weapons for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Public order: 30Published information about public order for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Robbery: 3Published information about robbery for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Shoplifting: 48Published information about shoplifting for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Theft from the person: 2Published information about theft from the person for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Vehicle crime: 28Published information about vehicle crime for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location
  • Violence and sexual offences: 181Published information about violence and sexual offences for the within 500 m.Police.uk street-level crime and outcomes · 2026-06 · Representative location

People & households

  • Age profile: Under 15: 206; 15 to 24: 115; 25 to 34: 201; 35 to 49: 261; 50 to 64: 315; 65 to 79: 408; 80 and over: 173Published information about age profile for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Country-of-birth profile: United Kingdom: 1,516; EU countries: 54; Rest of Europe: 13; Middle East and Asia: 51; Africa: 24; Americas and Caribbean: 15; Oceania and other: 4; British Overseas: 5Published information about country-of-birth profile for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Ethnic-group profile: Asian, Asian British or Asian Welsh: 59; Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African: 17; Mixed or Multiple ethnic groups: 29; White: 1,572; Other ethnic group: 5Published information about ethnic-group profile for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Families with children: Highest — Eastleigh 006I: 59.2%; Median: 39.5%; Lowest — Eastleigh 003A: 28.0%Published information about families with children for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Household composition: One person, aged 66+: 172; One person, under 66: 83; Couple family: 319; Lone parent family: 44; All aged 66+ family: 139; Other single family: 5; Other household types: 31Published information about household composition for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Household size: 1 person: 255; 2 people: 335; 3 people: 102; 4 people: 81; 5 or more people: 19; No usual residents: 0Published information about household size for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Marital and civil-partnership profile: Never married: 367; Married or civil partnership: 778; Divorced or dissolved: 138; Widowed or surviving partner: 159; Separated: 24Published information about marital and civil-partnership profile for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Qualifications: Level 4 and above: 533; Level 3: 239; Level 2: 188; Level 1 and entry: 127; Apprenticeship: 98; Other qualifications: 49; No qualifications: 231Published information about qualifications for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Religion profile: No religion: 655; Christian: 893; Muslim: 9; Hindu: 8; Sikh: 9; Jewish: 6; Buddhist: 11; Other religion: 6; Not answered: 84Published information about religion profile for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Female residents: Highest — Eastleigh 003A: 53.4%; Median: 50.8%; Lowest — Eastleigh 001C: 49.5%Published information about female residents for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Male residents: Highest — Eastleigh 001C: 50.5%; Median: 49.2%; Lowest — Eastleigh 003A: 46.6%Published information about male residents for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Students: Highest — Test Valley 014B: 8.1%; Median: 5.3%; Lowest — Eastleigh 003A: 2.9%Published information about students for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Estimated resident population: Highest — Eastleigh 006I: 2,446; Median: 1,703; Lowest — Test Valley 014D: 1,202Latest annual mid-year population estimateSmall-area population estimates (2021 based) · mid-2024 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Estimated age profile: 0 to 4: 71; 5 to 9: 78; 10 to 14: 65; 15 to 19: 51; 20 to 24: 64; 25 to 29: 100; 30 to 34: 102; 35 to 39: 93; 40 to 44: 89; 45 to 49: 80; 50 to 54: 94; 55 to 59: 101; 60 to 64: 99; 65 to 69: 99; 70 to 74: 151; 75 to 79: 158; 80 to 84: 97; 85 and over: 132Latest mid-year estimate in five-year age bandsSmall-area population estimates (2021 based) · mid-2024 · Representative location
  • Estimated sex profile: Male: 791; Female: 933Latest mid-year male and female population estimatesSmall-area population estimates (2021 based) · mid-2024 · Representative location
  • Population at Census 2021: 31,975Usual residents counted on Census dayTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Median age: 45.0 yearsMedian age of usual residents at Census 2021Towns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Age and sex profile: Female — aged 0 to 19: 3,630 (11.4%); Female — aged 20 to 39: 3,095 (9.7%); Female — aged 40 to 59: 4,695 (14.7%); Female — aged 60 to 79: 3,740 (11.7%); Female — aged 80+: 1,220 (3.8%); Male — aged 0 to 19: 3,820 (11.9%); Male — aged 20 to 39: 2,925 (9.1%); Male — aged 40 to 59: 4,540 (14.2%); Male — aged 60 to 79: 3,430 (10.7%); Male — aged 80+: 875 (2.7%)Residents grouped by sex and broad age bandTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Country of birth profile: Europe: EU countries: 1,180 (3.7%); Europe: United Kingdom: 28,115 (87.9%); Non-EU countries (including British Overseas): 2,680 (8.4%)Residents grouped by broad country-of-birth areaTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Usual residents: Highest — Test Valley 012A: 2,392; Median: 1,658.5; Lowest — Eastleigh 006I: 1,271People counted in this neighbourhood on census dayCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Population density: Highest — Eastleigh 006D: 4,937 per km²; Median: 2,832.85 per km²; Lowest — Winchester 009A: 47.4 per km²Residents per square kilometreCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Residents aged under 15: 12.3%Share of all residentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents aged 15 to 64: 53.1%Share of all residentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents aged 65 and over: 34.6%Share of all residentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • One-person households: 32.2%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Households with dependent children: 19.3%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Owner-occupied households: 82.4%Owned outright or with a mortgageCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Owned outright: 55.8%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Owned with a mortgage or loan: 26.6%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Population change, 2001 to 2021: 6.0%Change in usual residents between the 2001 and 2021 censusesUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2001 to Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Privately rented households: 15.9%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents aged 0–15: 6,110Usual residents aged 0 to 15 on Census dayUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Residents aged 16–24: 2,554Usual residents aged 16 to 24 on Census dayUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Socially rented households: 1.5%Council or housing associationCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Overcrowded households: 0.6%At least one bedroom short of the standardCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents aged 25–64: 16,004Usual residents aged 25 to 64 on Census dayUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Households with no car or van: 14.5%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents aged 65+: 7,268Usual residents aged 65 and over on Census dayUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Households with one car or van: 43.0%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Households with two or more cars or vans: 42.5%Share of all householdsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Registered live births: Highest — Eastleigh 006I: 52; Median: 10; Lowest — Eastleigh 001B: 1Live births registered for the surrounding LSOA in the latest calendar yearLive births in England and Wales for small geographic areas · 2025 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Residents with no qualifications: 15.8%Of residents aged 16 and overCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Registered deaths: Highest — Eastleigh 003A: 31; Median: 14; Lowest — Test Valley 014A: 5Deaths registered for residents of the surrounding LSOA in the latest calendar yearMortality statistics: registered deaths, all causes and ages · 2024 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Residents with a degree-level qualification: 36.4%Level 4 and above, of residents aged 16 and overCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents in good or very good health: 81.3%Self-assessed on census dayCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Residents born outside the UK: 9.9%Share of all residentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Change in residents aged 0–15: 4.6%Change in the age-group count between Census 2001 and Census 2021Understanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2001 to Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Largest ethnic group: WhiteThe high-level group most residents recordedCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Change in residents aged 16–24: -22.9%Change in the age-group count between Census 2001 and Census 2021Understanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2001 to Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Share in the largest ethnic group: 93.5%Of all residentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Change in residents aged 25–64: -2.1%Change in the age-group count between Census 2001 and Census 2021Understanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2001 to Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Change in residents aged 65+: 52.1%Change in the age-group count between Census 2001 and Census 2021Understanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2001 to Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Number of households: Highest — Test Valley 012A: 1,002; Median: 665; Lowest — Test Valley 014D: 500Households counted in the surrounding LSOACensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Passports held: United Kingdom: 1,434; Ireland: 3; Other Europe: 45; Africa: 2; Middle East and Asia: 15; Americas and Caribbean: 11; Oceania and Antarctica: 3; British Overseas Territories: 0; No passport: 169Published passport country-group countsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Household deprivation: Not deprived: 430; Deprived in 1 dimension: 279; Deprived in 2 dimensions: 77; Deprived in 3 dimensions: 7; Deprived in 4 dimensions: 0Households deprived in zero to four Census dimensionsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Year of arrival in the UK: Born in the UK: 1,516; Before 1951: 4; 1951 to 1960: 13; 1961 to 1970: 14; 1971 to 1980: 8; 1981 to 1990: 7; 1991 to 2000: 17; 2001 to 2010: 39; 2011 to 2013: 16; 2014 to 2016: 21; 2017 to 2019: 22; 2020 to 2021: 7Usual residents by published arrival-period bandCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Length of residence in the UK: Born in the UK: 1,516; 10 years or more: 102; 5 to under 10 years: 33; 2 to under 5 years: 21; Under 2 years: 11Usual residents by time lived in the United KingdomCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • National identity: British only: 944; English: 609; Welsh: 10; Other UK identities: 21; Irish: 4; Other identity: 94; Non-UK identity: 98Self-described national identity groupsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • English proficiency: Main language is English or Welsh: 1,582; Speaks English very well: 32; Speaks English well: 16; Cannot speak English well: 4; Cannot speak English: 4English or Welsh main language and spoken-English proficiencyCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Sexual orientation: Straight or heterosexual: 5,835; Gay or lesbian: 68; Bisexual: 60; All other sexual orientations: 19; Not answered: 373Voluntary Census response among residents aged 16 and overCensus 2021 MSOA topic summaries · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Turnout: Eastleigh: 66.3%; Romsey and Southampton North: 69.6%; Winchester: 72.9%Valid votes cast as a share of the electorateGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Electorate: Eastleigh: 69,965; Romsey and Southampton North: 71,871; Winchester: 78,289Registered electors at the 2024 general electionGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Second address: No second address: 1,623; Second address in the UK: 41; Second address outside the UK: 18Usual residents by whether a second address is usedCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Schoolchildren and full-time students: Highest — Test Valley 014B: 27.2%; Median: 19.4%; Lowest — Eastleigh 003A: 11.0%Share of residents aged 5 and over who are schoolchildren or full-time studentsCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Winning party: Eastleigh: Liberal Democrat; Romsey and Southampton North: Conservative; Winchester: Liberal DemocratParty of the member elected in 2024General election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Runner-up party: Eastleigh: Conservative; Romsey and Southampton North: Liberal Democrat; Winchester: ConservativeParty placed second in 2024General election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Seat outcome: Eastleigh: LD Gain; Romsey and Southampton North: Con Hold; Winchester: LD GainWhether the seat was held or changed handsGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Majority: Eastleigh: 1,546; Romsey and Southampton North: 2,191; Winchester: 13,821Votes between the winner and the runner-upGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Majority share: Eastleigh: 3.3%; Romsey and Southampton North: 4.4%; Winchester: 24.2%Winning margin as a share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share Conservative: Eastleigh: 31.1%; Romsey and Southampton North: 39.8%; Winchester: 28.2%Share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share Labour: Eastleigh: 15.1%; Romsey and Southampton North: 9.3%; Winchester: 5.3%Share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share Liberal Democrat: Eastleigh: 34.4%; Romsey and Southampton North: 35.4%; Winchester: 52.5%Share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share Reform UK: Eastleigh: 13.3%; Romsey and Southampton North: 11.4%; Winchester: 8.4%Share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share Green: Eastleigh: 5.2%; Romsey and Southampton North: 3.8%; Winchester: 4.8%Share of valid votesGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Vote share other candidates: Eastleigh: 1.0%; Romsey and Southampton North: 0.4%; Winchester: 0.8%All remaining candidates pooledGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Member elected in 2024: Eastleigh: Liz Jarvis; Romsey and Southampton North: Caroline Nokes; Winchester: Danny ChambersWho won the seat on 4 July 2024General election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Candidates standing: Eastleigh: 6; Romsey and Southampton North: 6; Winchester: 9People on the ballot paperGeneral election results by constituency · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Parliamentary constituency name: Eastleigh: Eastleigh; Romsey and Southampton North: Romsey and Southampton North; Winchester: WinchesterThe Westminster seat this postcode votes inUK Parliament data · 2026-10-02 · Named wider-area context
  • Current MP: Eastleigh: Liz Jarvis MP, member since 2024-07-04; Romsey and Southampton North: Caroline Nokes MP, member since 2010-05-06; Winchester: Dr Danny Chambers MP, member since 2024-07-04The member currently representing this constituencyUK Parliament data · 2026-10-02 · Named wider-area context
  • MP political party: Eastleigh: Liberal Democrat; Romsey and Southampton North: Conservative; Winchester: Liberal DemocratThe party the sitting member currently sits forUK Parliament data · 2026-10-02 · Named wider-area context
  • MP contact details: Eastleigh — Email: liz.jarvis.mp@parliament.uk; Eastleigh — Official page: https://members.parliament.uk/member/5040/contact; Romsey and Southampton North — Email: caroline.nokes.mp@parliament.uk; Romsey and Southampton North — Email: 020 7219 7218; Romsey and Southampton North — Official page: https://members.parliament.uk/member/4048/contact; Winchester — Email: danny.chambers.mp@parliament.uk; Winchester — Official page: https://members.parliament.uk/member/5304/contactPublished parliamentary office contactUK Parliament data · 2026-10-02 · Named wider-area context

Income, work & local economy

  • Overall relative disadvantage (decile, 1 = most deprived): 10 of 10, where 1 is most deprivedWhere this neighbourhood sits among all English LSOAsEnglish Indices of Deprivation 2025 · 2025 · Representative location
  • Equivalised household income before housing costs: Highest — Winchester 009: £51,967; Median: £42,897; Lowest — Eastleigh 006: £38,161Mean disposable income, adjusted for household sizeSmall area model-based income estimates · FYE 2023 · Range across wider neighbourhood areas
  • Jobs profile: WorkingWhether ONS classifies the town as working or residential from its job densityUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · ONS towns classification, May 2026 · Published town figure
  • Gross household income: Highest — Eastleigh 001: £83,652; Median: £67,360; Lowest — Eastleigh 006: £55,130Mean total annual income before taxSmall area model-based income estimates · FYE 2023 · Range across wider neighbourhood areas
  • Income disadvantage (decile, 1 = most deprived): 10 of 10, where 1 is most deprivedShare of the neighbourhood on a low income, ranked against EnglandEnglish Indices of Deprivation 2025 · 2025 · Representative location
  • Employment disadvantage (decile, 1 = most deprived): 10 of 10, where 1 is most deprivedInvoluntary exclusion from work, ranked against EnglandEnglish Indices of Deprivation 2025 · 2025 · Representative location
  • Net household income: Highest — Test Valley 014: £56,101; Median: £45,776; Lowest — Eastleigh 006: £41,123Mean disposable annual income after taxSmall area model-based income estimates · FYE 2023 · Range across wider neighbourhood areas
  • Equivalised household income after housing costs: Highest — Eastleigh 001: £45,613; Median: £42,187; Lowest — Eastleigh 006: £33,975Mean disposable income after rent or mortgage, adjusted for household sizeSmall area model-based income estimates · FYE 2023 · Range across wider neighbourhood areas
  • Business premises in this neighbourhood: 80Premises with a rateable value, at the last 31 MarchNon-domestic rating list / Find a business rates valuation · 2026 · Representative location
  • Economically inactive residents aged 16+: 38.0%Residents aged 16 and over who were not working or actively seeking workUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Employment rate: Eastleigh: 80.7%; Test Valley: 76.9%; Winchester: 79.3%Residents aged 16-64 in work, as a share of all residents that ageAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2026-03 · Named wider-area context
  • Number of children in low-income families, before housing costs: 145Children under 16 in this wardChildren in low income families local area statistics · FYE 2025 · Representative location
  • Retail premises in this neighbourhood: 40Shops, pubs and other retail premisesNon-domestic rating list / Find a business rates valuation · 2026 · Representative location
  • Retired residents aged 16+: 27.6%Residents aged 16 and over who were economically inactive because they were retiredUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Unemployment rate: 2.4%Economically active residents aged 16-64 who are unemployedAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2026-03 · Representative location
  • Economic activity rate: Eastleigh: 82.7%; Test Valley: 77.8%; Winchester: 81.7%Residents aged 16-64 either working or looking for workAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2026-03 · Named wider-area context
  • Largest business sector in this neighbourhood: RetailThe biggest of retail, offices, industry and otherNon-domestic rating list / Find a business rates valuation · 2026 · Representative location
  • Long-term sick or disabled residents aged 16+: 1.9%Residents aged 16 and over who were economically inactive because of long-term sickness or disabilityUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Economic inactivity rate: Eastleigh: 17.3%; Test Valley: 22.2%; Winchester: 18.3%Residents aged 16-64 neither working nor seeking workAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2026-03 · Named wider-area context
  • Economically inactive students aged 16+: 3.5%Residents aged 16 and over who were economically inactive studentsUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Number of children in low-income families, after housing costs: 208Children under 16 in this wardChildren in low income families local area statistics · FYE 2025 · Representative location
  • Total rateable value in this neighbourhood: £1,228,000All rateable business premises added togetherNon-domestic rating list / Find a business rates valuation · 2026 · Representative location
  • Average rateable value in this neighbourhood: £15,350Total rateable value divided by number of premisesNon-domestic rating list / Find a business rates valuation · 2026 · Representative location
  • Looking after home or family: 3.3%Residents aged 16 and over who were economically inactive while looking after home or familyUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Residents with degree-level qualifications: Eastleigh: 43.6%; Test Valley: 49.1%; Winchester: 61.7%Aged 16-64 holding a qualification at RQF level 4 or aboveAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2025-12 · Named wider-area context
  • Other economic inactivity: 1.6%Residents aged 16 and over with another reason for economic inactivityUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · Census 2021 · Published town figure
  • Residents with no qualifications: Eastleigh: 2.4%; Test Valley: 3.8%; Winchester: 2.8%Aged 16-64 reporting no formal qualificationAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2025-12 · Named wider-area context
  • Share of workers employed part time: Eastleigh: 25.2%; Test Valley: 20.4%; Winchester: 29.6%Of residents aged 16-64 in workAnnual Population Survey via Nomis · 2026-03 · Named wider-area context
  • Change in jobs, 2015 to 2024: 45.5%Percentage change in employment located in the townUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · 2015 to 2024 · Published town figure
  • People claiming unemployment-related benefits: 20Universal Credit claimants required to seek work, plus JSAClaimant Count via Nomis · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Claimants as a share of working-age residents: 2.2%Claimants as a percentage of residents aged 16-64Claimant Count via Nomis · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Jobs gained or lost, 2015 to 2024: 5,000Absolute change in employment located in the townUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · 2015 to 2024 · Published town figure
  • Claimants aged 16-24: 0Of the people claiming unemployment-related benefits hereClaimant Count via Nomis · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Companies registered at this postcode: 3,943Active companies whose registered office is this postcodeCompanies House company register · 2026-10 · Exact town total
  • Qualifications: Level 1 or entry level: 2,255 (8.7%); Level 2: 3,535 (13.7%); Level 3: 4,335 (16.8%); Level 4 or above: 10,730 (41.5%); No qualifications: 2,910 (11.3%); Other qualifications: 2,075 (8.0%)Residents grouped by highest qualification levelTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Companies incorporated here in the last 12 months: 322Registered at this postcode and incorporated within the yearCompanies House company register · 2026-10 · Exact town total
  • Employment status: Employed: 15,470 (59.9%); Not employed: 10,375 (40.1%)Working-age residents grouped as employed or not employedTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Companies registered in this postcode district: 3,923Active companies across the whole postcode districtCompanies House company register · 2026-10 · Representative location
  • Largest business category on the register here: Professional, scientific and technicalThe largest SIC section among companies registered in this districtCompanies House company register · 2026-10 · Representative location
  • Occupation of employed residents: Administrative and secretarial: 1,655 (10.7%); Associate professional and technical: 2,150 (13.9%); Caring, leisure and other services: 1,185 (7.7%); Elementary occupations: 910 (5.9%); Managers, directors and senior officials: 2,350 (15.2%); Process, plant and machine operatives: 635 (4.1%); Professional occupations: 4,305 (27.8%); Sales and customer service: 975 (6.3%); Skilled trades: 1,310 (8.5%)Employed residents grouped by broad occupationTowns and cities, characteristics of built-up areas, Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Company types registered in this district: Private Limited Company: 95.7%; Private company limited by guarantee: 2.4%; Limited Liability Partnership: 0.9%The most common legal forms on the register hereCompanies House company register · 2026-10 · Representative location
  • Hours worked: 15 hours or less: 83; 16 to 30 hours: 139; 31 to 48 hours: 476; 49 hours or more: 75Employed residents by usual weekly-hours bandCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC): Higher managerial and professional: 241; Lower managerial and professional: 364; Intermediate occupations: 218; Small employers and own-account workers: 150; Lower supervisory and technical: 96; Semi-routine occupations: 153; Routine occupations: 116; Never worked or long-term unemployed: 86; Full-time students: 41Residents aged 16 and over by NS-SEC classCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Employment history: Worked in the last 12 months: 64; Not worked in the last 12 months: 529; Never worked: 99People not in employment by when they last workedCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Jobs per working-age resident: Eastleigh: 0.82 jobs per resident aged 16 to 64; Test Valley: 0.89 jobs per resident aged 16 to 64; Winchester: 1.34 jobs per resident aged 16 to 64Number of jobs located in the local authority per resident aged 16 to 64Job density · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Gross median weekly pay: Eastleigh: £671; Test Valley: £690; Winchester: £727Median weekly gross pay for employee jobs, based on where employees liveGross median weekly pay · 2025 · Named wider-area context
  • Economically active: Highest — Eastleigh 006I: 85.2%; Median: 61.0%; Lowest — Eastleigh 001A: 46.5%Published information about economically active for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Employed: Highest — Eastleigh 006I: 82.0%; Median: 58.8%; Lowest — Eastleigh 001A: 44.7%Published information about employed for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Occupations: Managers and directors: 101; Professional: 196; Associate professional and technical: 117; Administrative and secretarial: 78; Skilled trades: 90; Caring, leisure and other service: 54; Sales and customer service: 47; Process, plant and machine operatives: 34; Elementary: 56Published information about occupations for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Retired: Highest — Eastleigh 001A: 42.0%; Median: 29.2%; Lowest — Eastleigh 006I: 2.5%Published information about retired for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Self-employed: Highest — Winchester 009A: 14.9%; Median: 9.1%; Lowest — Eastleigh 003E: 6.9%Published information about self-employed for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Unemployed: Highest — Eastleigh 006E: 3.8%; Median: 2.0%; Lowest — Test Valley 014C: 1.3%Published information about unemployed for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Work from home: Highest — Test Valley 014A: 53.3%; Median: 43.1%; Lowest — Eastleigh 006E: 21.2%Published information about work from home for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Industry of employed residents: Agriculture, forestry and fishing: 2; Mining and quarrying: 6; Manufacturing: 237; Energy supply: 39; Water, sewerage and waste: 28; Construction: 338; Wholesale, retail and motor repair: 483; Transport and storage: 163; Accommodation and food: 107; Information and communication: 251; Financial and insurance: 166; Real estate: 79; Professional, scientific and technical: 283; Administrative and support services: 168; Public administration and defence: 259; Education: 433; Health and social work: 536; Other industries: 154Broad industry groups for residents employed in Census weekCensus 2021 MSOA topic summaries · Census 2021 · Representative location

Local energy

  • Estimated households in fuel poverty: Highest — Winchester 009A: 92; Median: 38.5; Lowest — Test Valley 014A: 13Modelled number of fuel-poor households in this neighbourhood, 2024Sub-regional fuel poverty · 2024 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Estimated proportion of households in fuel poverty: Highest — Winchester 009A: 10.5%; Median: 5.5%; Lowest — Test Valley 014C: 2.2%Modelled share of homes in this neighbourhood that are fuel poor, 2024Sub-regional fuel poverty · 2024 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Households in this neighbourhood: Highest — Test Valley 012A: 1,066; Median: 710.5; Lowest — Test Valley 014D: 537Modelled number of homes in the LSOA, 2024Sub-regional fuel poverty · 2024 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Fuel poverty in this local authority: Eastleigh: 6.0%; Test Valley: 7.5%; Winchester: 8.2%Modelled share of homes across the whole council area, 2024Sub-regional fuel poverty · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Typical household electricity use: 2,204 kWhMedian annual consumption across meters on this postcodePostcode-level electricity statistics · 2024 · Representative location
  • Domestic electricity meters: 11Meters counted on this postcodePostcode-level electricity statistics · 2024 · Representative location
  • Typical household gas use: 7,692 kWhMedian annual consumption across meters on this postcodePostcode-level gas statistics · 2024 · Representative location
  • Domestic gas meters: 11Meters counted on this postcodePostcode-level gas statistics · 2024 · Representative location
  • Annual solar irradiation: Highest — SO53 5: 1,308 kWh/m²; Median: 1,308 kWh/m²; Lowest — SO51 9: 1,302 kWh/m²Energy falling on a square metre of optimally angled panelPVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Range across postcode sector areas
  • Electricity distribution network operator: Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks (Southern Electric Power Distribution (Southern England))The company that owns and operates the electricity network hereDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Primary electricity substation serving this area: Chandlers Ford (grid supply point: Nursling)The primary substation whose supply area contains this postcodeDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Typical output of a 4 kWp solar system: Highest — SO52 9: 4,107 kWh; Median: 4,103 kWh; Lowest — SO51 9: 4,096 kWhA standard domestic array at the best angle, over a yearPVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Range across postcode sector areas
  • Best panel tilt angle: Highest — SO53 5: 39°; Median: 39°; Lowest — SO51 9: 39°The slope that captures most energy over a year herePVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Range across postcode sector areas
  • Secondary electricity substation serving this area: Supplied from Chandlers FordThe low-voltage supply area this postcode sits inDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Best panel orientation: 177°The compass direction that collects most energy herePVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Representative location
  • Local electricity supply area: 6408 — bulk supply point VelmoreThe operator's own reference for the network that supplies this postcodeDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest electricity substation: 150 mStraight-line distance to the nearest substation of any kindDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Connected local solar capacity and installations: 787 connectionsSolar installations connected to the serving primary substationDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Connected electric-vehicle charger capacity and installations: 296 connectionsElectric-vehicle connections notified on the serving primary substationDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Connected heat pumps and their capacity: 65 connectionsHeat pumps connected to the serving primary substationDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Other low-carbon-technology penetration: 11.6%Share of customers on the serving substation with low-carbon technologyDNO open-data portals · 2026 · Representative location
  • Solar projects: 8Schemes of 150 kW and above that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Onshore wind projects: 0Schemes of 150 kW and above that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Offshore wind projects: 0Schemes that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Battery storage projects: 3Schemes that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Hydro projects: 0Schemes of 150 kW and above that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Biomass and waste-to-energy projects: 0Schemes that exist or may yet existRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Other renewable technology projects: 0Tidal, wave, geothermal, hydrogen and fuel cellsRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Renewable energy projects: 11All technologies, with the stage each has reachedRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Operational renewable capacity: 6.4 MWInstalled capacity of schemes that are generatingRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Renewable capacity in the pipeline: 113.62 MWApproved, under construction or awaiting a decisionRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Nearest renewable energy project: 950 mStraight-line distance, with the scheme and its stageRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Stage of the nearest renewable project: Planning Permission Granted (Unit 2b, School Lane - Solar Panels)As recorded at the last quarterly extractRenewable Energy Planning Database · Q2 2026 · Representative location
  • Heat network schemes: 1Recorded schemes that exist or may yet existHeat Networks Planning Database · Q1 2026 · Representative location
  • Nearest heat network scheme: 2.3 kmStraight-line distance, with the scheme and its stageHeat Networks Planning Database · Q1 2026 · Representative location
  • Stage of the nearest heat network scheme: Under Construction (Ampfield Meadows, Chandlers Ford Retirement Village - Phase 1)As recorded at the last quarterly extractHeat Networks Planning Database · Q1 2026 · Representative location
  • Type and scale of the nearest heat network: 58Network type, technology and reported connectionsHeat Networks Planning Database · Q1 2026 · Representative location
  • Emissions per resident: Eastleigh: 3.46 t CO2e per resident; Test Valley: 5.52 t CO2e per resident; Winchester: 5.76 t CO2e per residentCouncil area total divided by its populationUK local authority greenhouse-gas emissions · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Council area greenhouse gas emissions: Eastleigh: 494.2 kt CO2e; Test Valley: 746.9 kt CO2e; Winchester: 781.1 kt CO2eEverything emitted inside the local authority boundaryUK local authority greenhouse-gas emissions · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Change in emissions since 2005: Eastleigh: -48.3%; Test Valley: -37.4%; Winchester: -39.1%Council area total against the start of the seriesUK local authority greenhouse-gas emissions · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Largest emitting sector: 46.4%The sector responsible for most of the council area's emissionsUK local authority greenhouse-gas emissions · 2024 · Representative location
  • Greenhouse-gas emissions by sector: Transport: 229.2 kt CO2e; Domestic: 143.9 kt CO2e; Industry: 41.5 kt CO2e; Commercial: 39.8 kt CO2e; Waste: 19.5 kt CO2e; Public Sector: 11.9 kt CO2e; Agriculture: 7.3 kt CO2e; LULUCF: 1.1 kt CO2ePublished information about greenhouse-gas emissions by sector for the council area.UK local authority greenhouse-gas emissions · 2024 · Representative location
  • Expected solar photovoltaic (PV) output by month: January: 168 kWh; February: 221 kWh; March: 357 kWh; April: 461 kWh; May: 482 kWh; June: 486 kWh; July: 485 kWh; August: 437 kWh; September: 382 kWh; October: 278 kWh; November: 197 kWh; December: 148 kWhPublished information about expected solar photovoltaic (pv) output by month for the postcode sector.PVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Representative location
  • Solar resource by month: January: 50.2 kWh/m²; February: 66.8 kWh/m²; March: 109.5 kWh/m²; April: 146.3 kWh/m²; May: 155.9 kWh/m²; June: 159.8 kWh/m²; July: 161.6 kWh/m²; August: 143.7 kWh/m²; September: 123.1 kWh/m²; October: 86.8 kWh/m²; November: 60 kWh/m²; December: 44.3 kWh/m²Published information about solar resource by month for the postcode sector.PVGIS 5.3 · 2005-2023 · Representative location
  • Central heating: Mains gas: 662; Electric: 64; Two or more types: 60; Oil: 0; Tank or bottled gas: 0; District or communal: 1; Renewable: 1; Solid fuel: 0; Wood: 1; Other: 0; No central heating: 4Published information about central heating for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location

Air, land & environment

  • Modelled PM2.5: Highest — SU4420: 6.8 µg/m³; Median: 6.4 µg/m³; Lowest — SU4119: 6 µg/m³Annual average fine particulate matterUK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled PM10: Highest — SU4420: 12.09 µg/m³; Median: 10.03 µg/m³; Lowest — SU4222: 9.27 µg/m³Annual average coarse particulate matterUK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled nitrogen dioxide: Highest — SU4318: 13.1 µg/m³; Median: 9.38 µg/m³; Lowest — SU4121: 7.22 µg/m³Annual average NO₂UK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled nitrogen oxides: Highest — SU4318: 17.44 µg/m³ as NO₂; Median: 12.14 µg/m³ as NO₂; Lowest — SU4121: 9.16 µg/m³ as NO₂Annual average NOx, expressed as NO₂UK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled sulphur dioxide: Highest — SU4320: 2.21 µg/m³; Median: 1.5 µg/m³; Lowest — SU4121: 1.17 µg/m³Annual average SO₂UK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled benzene: Highest — SU4419: 0.41 µg/m³; Median: 0.38 µg/m³; Lowest — SU4121: 0.34 µg/m³Annual average benzeneUK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Modelled ozone exceedance days: Highest — SU4121: 3.98 days; Median: 3.7 days; Lowest — SU4318: 3.21 daysDays a year the 8-hour ozone target is exceededUK background air-pollution maps · 2024 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Indicative radon potential: 1 to 3% of homes above the Action Level: 0; 10 to 30% of homes above the Action Level: 0; 3 to 5% of homes above the Action Level: 9; 30% or more of homes above the Action Level: 0; 5 to 10% of homes above the Action Level: 0; Less than 1% of homes above the Action Level: 8Estimated share of homes above the radon Action LevelIndicative radon potential map · 2021 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Radon Affected Area: No — this square is below the Affected Area threshold: 8; Yes — this square is within a radon Affected Area: 9Whether UKHSA classify this square as radon affectedIndicative radon potential map · 2021 · Range across 1 km area areas
  • Nearest air-quality monitoring station: Southampton CentreClosest automatic station currently reportingUK-AIR monitoring / Sensor Observation Service · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest monitoring station: 8.5 kmStraight-line distance to the closest reporting stationUK-AIR monitoring / Sensor Observation Service · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Latest measurements at that station: NO₂ 45.0 µg/m³, O₃ 3.0 µg/m³, PM10 14.0 µg/m³, PM2.5 6.0 µg/m³, SO₂ 6.0 µg/m³Most recent published concentrationsUK-AIR monitoring / Sensor Observation Service · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Air pollution index at that station: Low (index 1 of 10, driven by PM10)Defra Daily Air Quality Index bandUK-AIR monitoring / Sensor Observation Service · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Nearest legally designated site: 1.6 kmClosest SSSI, SAC, SPA, Ramsar, nature reserve, National Park or National LandscapeProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Type of the nearest monitoring station: Urban BackgroundWhat kind of location that station measuresUK-AIR monitoring / Sensor Observation Service · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Average maximum temperature: 14.7 °CDaily maximum, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Nearest storm overflow: PARK ROAD CHANDLERS FORD CSO, discharging to MONKS BROOKThe closest monitored outfall, and what it discharges intoEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Average minimum temperature: 6.6 °CDaily minimum, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest storm overflow: 600 mStraight-line distance to the closest monitored outfallEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Nearest flood-warning area: 300 mThe closest area the Environment Agency warns forEnvironment Agency flood monitoring · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Annual spill event count: 4Spills recorded at the nearest overflow in its latest reporting yearEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Average temperature: 10.6 °CDaily mean, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Nearest river-level monitoring station: 500 mStraight-line distance to the closest gauging stationEnvironment Agency flood monitoring · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Annual rainfall: 806.1 mmTotal in an average year, 1991–2020HadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Annual total spill duration: 9.67 hoursHours of recorded discharge at the nearest overflow, latest yearEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Annual sunshine: 1,670.8 hoursHours of bright sunshine in an average year, 1991–2020HadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Monitor uptime at the nearest storm overflow: 97.0%Share of the reporting year the monitor actually workedEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Average July maximum: 22.3 °CDaily maximum in July, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Flood warning area covering this postcode: 0Whether the postcode falls inside an Environment Agency warning areaEnvironment Agency flood monitoring · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Overflow operator (water company): Southern WaterThe company that reported this overflow to the Environment AgencyEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Average January minimum: 1.9 °CDaily minimum in January, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Reservoir failure extent — wet-day scenario: If a large raised reservoir failed on a wet day, when rivers are already high, this postcode centroid is outside the published mapped extents in this dataset.Where released water could spread if a large raised reservoir failed while rivers were already highReservoir flood extents · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Storm overflows: 10Monitored outfalls on the sewer network nearbyEvent Duration Monitoring / storm overflows · 2024 · Representative location
  • Days of air frost: 43 daysNights the air temperature fell below zero, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Reservoir failure extent — dry-day scenario: If a large raised reservoir failed on a dry day, with rivers at normal levels, this postcode centroid is outside the published mapped extents in this dataset.Where released water could spread if a large raised reservoir failed while rivers were at normal levelsReservoir flood extents · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Days with rain: 123.5 daysDays a year with at least 1 mm of rain, 1991–2020 averageHadUK-Grid climate observations · 1991-2020 normal (series to 2026) · Representative location
  • Coal Mining Reporting Area intersection: Not within the Coal Mining Reporting AreaWhether this postcode sits in the area where a coal mining report is recommendedCoal mining information / map services · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest water quality monitoring site: PIRELLI GENERAL DSD SEDIMENT — MISCELLANEOUS ENVIRONMENT - SEDIMENTSThe closest Environment Agency sampling point, and what it samplesWater Quality Archive · 2025–2026 · Representative location
  • Coal-mining Development High Risk Area intersection: Not within a coal mining development risk areaThe planning classification of the ground here: high risk, low risk, or neitherCoal mining information / map services · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest water quality monitoring site: 2.0 kmStraight-line distance to the closest sampling pointWater Quality Archive · 2025–2026 · Representative location
  • Coalfield consultation area: Not within a coalfield consultation areaWhether the postcode falls in a mapped coalfield consultation areaCoal mining information / map services · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Coal mining licence area: Not within a coal mining licence areaWhether the postcode falls in an area licensed for coal mining, past or presentCoal mining information / map services · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Bedrock geology: Bracklesham Group And Barton Group (Undifferentiated) — Sand, Silt And Clay (Palaeogene)The rock mapped beneath this area, at 1:625,000BGS OpenGeoscience · 1:625,000 national geology, bedrock v5 (2008) · Representative location
  • Superficial geology: No superficial deposit mapped at 1:625,000Deposits lying over the bedrock, where any are mappedBGS OpenGeoscience · 1:625,000 national geology, bedrock v5 (2008) · Representative location
  • Broad soil landscape type: Prequaternary Marine/Estuarine SandThe geological material the soils here have formed overSoil Parent Material Model — 1 km open version · 2014 (v1, derived from Parent Material Model 1:50,000 v6) · Representative location
  • Soil parent material grain size: Argillic - ArenaceousBGS's grain-size class for the material beneath: clay-rich, sandy, gravelly or peatSoil Parent Material Model — 1 km open version · 2014 (v1, derived from Parent Material Model 1:50,000 v6) · Representative location
  • Soil texture class: Sand To LoamThe texture range expected over this parent materialSoil Parent Material Model — 1 km open version · 2014 (v1, derived from Parent Material Model 1:50,000 v6) · Representative location
  • Soil depth class: DeepHow deep soils here typically run before reaching the parent materialSoil Parent Material Model — 1 km open version · 2014 (v1, derived from Parent Material Model 1:50,000 v6) · Representative location
  • Carbonate content of parent material: NoneHow much chalk or limestone the underlying material holdsSoil Parent Material Model — 1 km open version · 2014 (v1, derived from Parent Material Model 1:50,000 v6) · Representative location
  • Current official drought status: Drought across Solent and South Downs, as at 21 August 2026. Declared for the whole Environment Agency area, not for this postcode.Declared status for the Environment Agency area, as at the last reportDry weather and drought status reports · 2026-08-21 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest historic landfill: 1.3 kmStraight-line distance to the edge of the nearest recorded siteHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Shrink-swell clay susceptibility: Significant susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcode — areas of localised significant ratingHow much the clay in this 5 km area is rated to swell and shrink with moistureBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Current water-supply and drought update: Despite recent rainfall and cooler weather, conditions remain drier than normal, with below average rainfall observed across all regions. For England as a whole, the rainfall total for August to date is 17% of the long term average (LTA). Rivers flows responded to the rainfall, however the majority of sites remain classed as below normal or lower for the time of year. A quarter of river sites, predominantly across southern and eastern areas, are classed as exceptionally low. The seasonal decline of groundwater levels continues, with levels in the chalk generally healthier than levels in the Oolite Limestone aquifers which are exceptionally low in places. Reservoir storage for England has declined 3.4% this week, down to 62.6% on 18 August. This is below average for the time of year. Seven major reservoirs are classed as having exceptionally low storage. There has been no change to Environment Agency area drought status this week, with 71% of England by land now in drought. Water companies continue to face sustained high demand due to the long period of warm weather and reduced rainfall. Affinity Water expanded its temporary use ban (TUB) across its eastern region on 17 August and Wessex Water implemented a company wide TUB on 18 August. Approximately 29 million people now have restrictions on their use of water. The agricultural sector is under increasing pressure, with poor crop yields and reduced grass growth affecting livestock farmers. There are reports of agricultural boreholes drying up and farm reservoirs at critically low levels. Over 1,500 abstraction licence restrictions are currently in place, including mandatory section 57 spray irrigation reductions in East Anglia and a growing number of voluntary restrictions across several catchments. Root crop harvesting is expected to be challenging due to exceptionally hard ground conditions. Environmental impacts are also increasing. Since the start of 2026, 226 drought and dry weather related incidents have been recorded, including: Navigation across reservoir fed canals are increasingly affected by low levels, while river navigation routes remain more resilient. Many canals are open for navigation, but an increasing number of closures and restrictions are being reported. The Environment Agency continues its drought response, including activated incident management arrangements and increased environmental monitoring. The National Drought Group will now meet weekly to coordinate action and monitor risks as drought conditions continue.The Environment Agency's own summary, verbatimDry weather and drought status reports · 2026-08-21 · Representative location
  • Historic landfill site name: Allbrook BrickworksWhat the Environment Agency's record calls the nearest siteHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Landslide susceptibility: Low susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcode — areas of localised significant ratingHow prone the ground across this 5 km area is rated to slope instabilityBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Environment Agency area: Solent and South DownsWhich of the 14 operational areas covers this postcodeDry weather and drought status reports · 2026-08-21 · Representative location
  • Historic landfill known waste type: inert — at Allbrook BrickworksThe categories of waste the record says went into the nearest siteHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Susceptibility to soluble rock and sinkholes: Low susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcodeHow likely dissolvable rock — chalk, limestone, gypsum, salt — is to underlie this 5 km areaBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Compressible-ground susceptibility: Low susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcode — areas of localised significant ratingHow likely soft ground that settles under load is to underlie this 5 km areaBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Historic landfill operational dates: Waste recorded from September 1977 to November 1981 at Allbrook BrickworksFirst and last recorded waste input at the nearest siteHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Collapsible-deposit susceptibility: Low susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcode — areas of localised significant ratingHow likely deposits that collapse when wetted or loaded are to underlie this 5 km areaBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Historic landfill sites: 0Recorded former tips whose outline falls within a kilometreHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • How the nearest historic landfill outline was mapped: A boundary held in the Environment Agency's records, digitised from its own survey materialWhether the boundary is surveyed or approximatedHistoric Landfill Sites · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Running-sand susceptibility: Low susceptibility across the 5 km area (about 65 square kilometres) containing this postcode — areas of localised significant ratingHow likely water-bearing sand that can flow into excavations is to underlie this 5 km areaBGS GeoSure 5 km hex grid · GeoSure v8, generalised to 5 km hexagons · Representative location
  • Elevation above sea level: 42 mGround height at the postcode centroid, from OS Terrain 50OS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearby permitted waste operations: 1Permitted waste sites within 1 kmPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Projected change in summer temperature: 2.28 °C changeHow much warmer summers here are projected to be at 2 °C of global warming, against 1981-2000UK Climate Projections (UKCP18), 12 km regional strand · UKCP18 RCP8.5 regional projections at 1.5-4 °C global warming levels, against a 1981-2000 baseline · Representative location
  • Local elevation range: 29 mHighest ground minus lowest ground within 500 mOS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearby industrial installations: 0Permitted installations within 1 kmPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Projected very hot days per year: 7.4 days per yearDays a year above 30 °C projected here at 2 °C of global warming, against 1981-2000UK Climate Projections (UKCP18), 12 km regional strand · UKCP18 RCP8.5 regional projections at 1.5-4 °C global warming levels, against a 1981-2000 baseline · Representative location
  • Nearby radioactive-substances permits: 0Permits to keep or use radioactive material within 1 kmPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Projected change in winter rainfall: 15.52 % changeHow much wetter or drier winters here are projected to be at 2 °C of global warmingUK Climate Projections (UKCP18), 12 km regional strand · UKCP18 RCP8.5 regional projections at 1.5-4 °C global warming levels, against a 1981-2000 baseline · Representative location
  • Terrain slope: 1.3°Gradient of the ground over a 100 m window around the postcodeOS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearby discharge consents and permits: 3Permitted discharges to water or ground within 1 kmPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Terrain aspect: South-west-facingCompass direction the surrounding ground faces downhillOS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Relative elevation versus surrounding neighbourhood: 11 mHeight at the postcode against the average of the kilometre around itOS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest permitted site: 250 mDistance to the closest entry on any Environment Agency registerPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Ground height compared with the surrounding area: Higher than the surrounding kilometreWhether the postcode sits above or below its surroundingsOS Terrain 50 · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Permitted sites: 11Current register entries of every kind within 1 kmPublic Registers for environmental information · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Distance to mapped erosion frontage: 6.6 kmHow far this postcode is from the nearest stretch of coast mapped for erosionNational Coastal Erosion Risk Mapping (NCERM) — National (2024) · 2024 · Representative location
  • Modelled topsoil geochemistry by element: Arsenic: 11.2 mg/kg; Cadmium: 0.42 mg/kg; Chromium: 69.0 mg/kg; Copper: 15.7 mg/kg; Nickel: 17.4 mg/kg; Lead: 50.2 mg/kg; Selenium: 0.97 mg/kg; Zinc: 62.5 mg/kgModelled concentrations of eight trace elements in the topsoil of this 500 m squareUK topsoil geochemistry raster (UKTS) · Topsoil samples 1978-2014, modelled surface published 2024 · Representative location
  • Modelled topsoil element concentration: 50.16 mg/kgModelled total lead in the topsoil of this 500 m square, in mg/kgUK topsoil geochemistry raster (UKTS) · Topsoil samples 1978-2014, modelled surface published 2024 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest mapped airport noise contour: 2.3 kmHow far this postcode is from the nearest mapped airport noise contourAirport noise, all metrics, England, Round 4 · 2021 traffic (Environmental Noise Regulations Round 4) · Representative location
  • Nearest recorded landslide: 1.4 kmHow far away the nearest landslide in the national record isNational Landslide Database / GeoIndex index · 2026 · Representative location
  • Recorded landslides: 0How many landslides in the national record are within a kilometreNational Landslide Database / GeoIndex index · 2026 · Representative location

Nature & green space

  • Nearest public park: 850 mThe closest site mapped as a public park or gardenOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest public park: 850 mStraight-line distance to its nearest mapped entranceOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Public greenspace count: 15Mapped greenspace sites reaching within 1 kmOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Public greenspace area: 8.7 haHectares of mapped greenspace inside the 1 km circleOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest play space: 200 mThe closest mapped children's play areaOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest playing field: 80 mThe closest mapped playing fieldOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest sports facility: 200 mOutdoor sites mapped by Ordnance Survey: sports facilities, bowling greens, tennis courts and golf coursesOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest allotment: 1.1 kmThe closest allotments or community growing spaceOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest greenspace access point: 80 mThe closest mapped way in to any greenspace siteOS Open Greenspace · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Designations covering this postcode: This postcode is not inside any designated siteEvery legal designation whose boundary contains the postcode centroidProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest Site of Special Scientific Interest: 1.8 kmStraight-line distance to the boundary of the closest SSSIProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Inside a Site of Special Scientific Interest: Not inside a Site of Special Scientific InterestWhether the postcode centroid falls within an SSSI boundaryProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest National Nature Reserve: 16 kmStraight-line distance to the closest reserve boundaryProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest Local Nature Reserve: 1.6 kmStraight-line distance to the closest reserve boundaryProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest ancient woodland: 100 mStraight-line distance to the closest mapped parcel within 10 kmProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest Special Area of Conservation: 1.8 kmStraight-line distance to the closest SAC boundaryProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest Special Protection Area: 5.2 kmStraight-line distance to the closest SPA boundaryProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest internationally protected wetland (Ramsar site): 7.3 kmStraight-line distance to the closest wetland of international importanceProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • National Park: Not in a National Park. Nearest is SOUTH DOWNS National Park, about 3.3 km awayWhether this postcode is inside one, and the nearest if notProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest National Landscape (formerly Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty): Not in a National Landscape. Nearest is Isle Of Wight National Landscape, about 25.2 km awayWhether this postcode is inside one, and the nearest if notProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest priority habitat: 80 mClosest mapped parcel within 10 kmProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Nearest priority habitat: type: No main habitat but additional habitats presentThe main habitat recorded for the closest parcelProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Priority habitat: 18.2 haMapped habitat area, clipped to the radiusProtected sites / habitats datasets · 2026-08-24 · Representative location
  • Ward tree canopy cover percentage: 24.7%Share of the ward under tree canopy, in the survey yearUK Ward Canopy Cover · 2018-2022 (per-ward survey year) · Representative location
  • Tree canopy comparison with other wards: 87.2%Where this ward ranks among surveyed wards in its nationUK Ward Canopy Cover · 2018-2022 (per-ward survey year) · Representative location
  • Nearest mapped woodland: 150 mThe closest wood of half a hectare or more, and its typeNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Distance to nearest woodland: 150 mStraight-line distance to the nearest mapped woodlandNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Woodland area: 3.0 haHectares of mapped woodland inside a 500 m circleNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Woodland area: 23.2 haHectares of mapped woodland inside a 1 km circleNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Woodland area: 1,775.2 haHectares of mapped woodland inside a 5 km circleNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Woodland type: Broadleaved (23.2 ha within 1 km)The interpreted forest type covering most ground within 1 kmNational Forest Inventory / Forestry Commission open data · 2024 (imagery to summer 2024) · Representative location
  • Nearest classified river or water body: 400 mDistance to the closest river, lake or coastal water assessed under the Water Framework DirectiveCatchment Data Explorer water-body classification · Cycle 3 — ecological 2022, chemical 2019 · Representative location
  • Ecological status: Moderate — Monks Brook (2022 assessment)How the Environment Agency classify the river water body this postcode drains intoCatchment Data Explorer water-body classification · Cycle 3 — ecological 2022, chemical 2019 · Representative location
  • Chemical status: Fail — Monks Brook (2019 assessment; 100% of assessed English surface water bodies are classified the same)The Environment Agency chemical classification of that water body, with how common the same verdict isCatchment Data Explorer water-body classification · Cycle 3 — ecological 2022, chemical 2019 · Representative location
  • Number of reasons the water body is below good status: 10 reasonsHow many pressures the Environment Agency record on that water body, and which sectorsCatchment Data Explorer water-body classification · Cycle 3 — ecological 2022, chemical 2019 · Representative location

Planning, buildings & heritage

  • Conservation area: NoWhether this postcode falls inside a designated conservation areaPlanning Data platform · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Green Belt: NoWhether this postcode falls inside designated Green BeltPlanning Data platform · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Nearest listed building: 500 mStraight-line distance to the closest statutorily listed buildingPlanning Data platform · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Listed buildings: 1Statutorily listed buildings close to this postcodePlanning Data platform · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Scheduled monument: Not inside a scheduled monumentWhether this postcode falls inside a scheduled monumentNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Nearest scheduled monument: 1.5 kmStraight-line distance to the closest scheduled monument within 10 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Registered park/garden: Not inside a registered park or gardenWhether this postcode falls inside a registered park or gardenNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Nearest registered park/garden: 1.9 kmStraight-line distance to the closest registered park or garden within 10 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Registered battlefield: Not inside a registered battlefieldWhether this postcode falls inside a registered battlefieldNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Nearest registered battlefield: 17 kmStraight-line distance to the closest registered battlefield within 25 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • World Heritage Site: Not inside a World Heritage SiteWhether this postcode falls inside a World Heritage SiteNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Protected wreck site distance: 12 kmStraight-line distance to the closest protected wreck site within 25 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Nearest World Heritage Site: 35 kmStraight-line distance to the closest World Heritage Site within 50 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Heritage at risk entries: 0Designated assets on the 2024 Heritage at Risk Register nearbyNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Nearest heritage at risk entry: 5.0 kmStraight-line distance to the closest entry on the 2024 register within 5 kmNational Heritage List spatial data · 2026-08-28 · Representative location

Schools & childcare

  • Nearest primary school: 150 mStraight-line distance to the closest open primary schoolCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest primary school: reading, writing and maths: 55.0%Pupils reaching the expected standard in all three, most recent published yearCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest secondary school: 600 mStraight-line distance to the closest open secondary schoolCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest secondary school: Attainment 8: 47.8Average score across eight qualifications, most recent published yearCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest further education provider: 2.4 kmClosest college or 16-plus provider on the DfE registerCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest secondary school: Progress 8: 0.2Progress from key stage 2 to key stage 4, most recent published yearCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: phase: PrimaryThe age range group the closest school servesCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: type: Voluntary aided schoolAcademy, community school, voluntary aided and so onCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: pupils on roll: 186From the most recent school census recorded in GIASCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: pupils eligible for free school meals: 12.9%A pupil characteristic, not a measure of the schoolCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: academy trust: Not part of an academy trustThe trust running the closest school, where it is in oneCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Primary schools: 6Open primary schools on the DfE registerCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Secondary schools: 5Open secondary schools on the DfE registerCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Latest school inspection date: 22 November 2023When the nearest school was last inspectedState-funded school inspections and outcomes: management information · 2026-07-31 · Representative location
  • Nearest nursery or childcare provider: 400 mStraight-line distance to the closest registered providerOfsted childcare providers and inspections · 2026-03-31 · Representative location
  • Childcare providers: 7Active providers on non-domestic premisesOfsted childcare providers and inspections · 2026-03-31 · Representative location
  • Latest school inspection outcome judgements: Ungraded inspection of 22 November 2023 under the previous framework: School remains GoodWhat the inspection concluded, on the framework it was made underState-funded school inspections and outcomes: management information · 2026-07-31 · Representative location
  • Nearest childcare provider type: Childcare on non-domestic premisesWhat kind of provider the nearest one isOfsted childcare providers and inspections · 2026-03-31 · Representative location
  • School inspection report link: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/inspection-reports/find-inspection-report/provider/ELS/116383The Ofsted page for the nearest schoolState-funded school inspections and outcomes: management information · 2026-07-31 · Representative location
  • Years since the nearest school was inspected: 2.8 yearsHow old the judgement beside it isState-funded school inspections and outcomes: management information · 2026-07-31 · Representative location
  • Nearest childcare provider registered places: 35How many children the nearest provider may care forOfsted childcare providers and inspections · 2026-03-31 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: published capacity: 210Number of places in the latest GIAS registerCompare school performance data · 2024/25 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: unfilled places in annual snapshot: 9DfE whole-school unfilled-place count at the latest 1 May capacity snapshotSchool capacity: school-level annual snapshot · 2024/25 · Representative location

Health & care

  • Nearest GP practice: 450 mStraight-line distance to the closest practice still openNHS Organisation Data Service — GP practice register · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • GP practices: 7Open practices with a registered address inside 5 kmNHS Organisation Data Service — GP practice register · 2026-08-28 · Representative location
  • Recorded diabetes prevalence at GP practice: 6.8%Patients aged 17 and over on the practice's diabetes registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded asthma prevalence at GP practice: 7.3%Patients aged 6 and over on the practice's asthma registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded hypertension prevalence at GP practice: 16.7%Patients on the practice's hypertension registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence at GP practice: 1.4%Patients on the practice's chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded depression prevalence at GP practice: 15.8%Patients aged 18 and over on the practice's depression registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded coronary heart disease prevalence at GP practice: 3.3%Patients on the practice's coronary heart disease registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • GP practice quality-framework achievement: 98.6%Points earned against the maximum available to that practiceQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded cancer prevalence at GP practice: 6.1%Patients on the practice's cancer registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Recorded dementia prevalence at GP practice: 1.4%Patients on the practice's dementia registerQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Registered list size at the nearest GP practice: 15,338Patients registered with that practiceQuality and Outcomes Framework · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Male life expectancy at birth: Eastleigh: 81.4 years; Test Valley: 81.4 years; Winchester: 82.0 yearsYears a boy born here now could expect to liveFingertips public-health data · 2019 - 23 · Named wider-area context
  • Nearby care homes: 3Care homes registered with Care Quality Commission (CQC) within 1 kmCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Overall experience of GP practice: 91.2%Patients rating their practice good overallGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Experience of contacting the practice: 85.4%Patients describing their last contact as goodGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Female life expectancy at birth: Eastleigh: 84.7 years; Test Valley: 84.3 years; Winchester: 85.9 yearsYears a girl born here now could expect to liveFingertips public-health data · 2019 - 23 · Named wider-area context
  • Nearby regulated GP services: 1GP practice sites registered with Care Quality Commission (CQC) within 1 kmCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Ease of contacting the practice by phone: 76.5%Patients finding the phone easy to useGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Male life expectancy at 65: Eastleigh: 20.0 years; Test Valley: 20.5 years; Winchester: 20.7 yearsFurther years a man reaching 65 could expectFingertips public-health data · 2023 - 25 · Named wider-area context
  • Nearby regulated dentists: 2Dental practices registered with Care Quality Commission (CQC) within 1 kmCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Ease of contacting the practice through its website: 73.6%Patients finding the website easy to useGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Female life expectancy at 65: Eastleigh: 22.5 years; Test Valley: 22.4 years; Winchester: 23.3 yearsFurther years a woman reaching 65 could expectFingertips public-health data · 2023 - 25 · Named wider-area context
  • Nearby hospitals: 4Acute hospital sites registered with Care Quality Commission (CQC) within 5 kmCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Care Quality Commission rating of the nearest service: Requires improvement — Chandlers Ford Care Home, published 25 January 2023The regulator's judgement on one named service, with its dateCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Ease of contacting the practice through the NHS App: 69.6%Patients finding the NHS App easy to useGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Under 75 mortality from all causes: Eastleigh: 262.19 per 100,000; Test Valley: 260.36 per 100,000; Winchester: 224.89 per 100,000Age-standardised deaths under 75, per 100,000Fingertips public-health data · 2023 - 25 · Named wider-area context
  • Helpfulness of reception staff: 95.8%Patients finding reception helpfulGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Latest Care Quality Commission (CQC) report publication date nearby: 22 July 2026The most recent publication date among rated services within 1 kmCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Under 75 mortality from cardiovascular disease: Eastleigh: 57.09 per 100,000; Test Valley: 52.87 per 100,000; Winchester: 49.17 per 100,000Age-standardised deaths under 75, per 100,000Fingertips public-health data · 2023 - 25 · Named wider-area context
  • Confidence and trust in the healthcare professional: 97.2%Patients with confidence in whoever they sawGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Registered care services: 9All Care Quality Commission (CQC)-registered locations, health and social care togetherCare Quality Commission register · 01 September 2026 · Representative location
  • Under 75 mortality from cancer: Eastleigh: 102.61 per 100,000; Test Valley: 104.14 per 100,000; Winchester: 91.94 per 100,000Age-standardised deaths under 75, per 100,000Fingertips public-health data · 2023 - 25 · Named wider-area context
  • Infant mortality rate: Eastleigh: 2.25 per 1,000 live births; Test Valley: 2.94 per 1,000 live births; Winchester: 4.21 per 1,000 live birthsDeaths under one year per 1,000 live birthsFingertips public-health data · 2022 - 24 · Named wider-area context
  • Needs met at the last appointment: 96.5%Patients whose needs were met, definitely or in partGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Reception-age children living with obesity: Eastleigh: 8.7%; Test Valley: 8.3%; Winchester: 8.0%Children aged 4 to 5 measured as obeseFingertips public-health data · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Satisfaction with the wait for the last appointment: 70.6%Patients content with how long they waitedGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Being listened to at the last appointment: 97.2%Patients rating the professional good at listeningGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Year 6 children living with obesity: Eastleigh: 17.4%; Test Valley: 18.7%; Winchester: 14.9%Children aged 10 to 11 measured as obeseFingertips public-health data · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Being involved in decisions about care: 97.7%Patients as involved as they wanted to beGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Low birth weight of term babies: Eastleigh: 2.1%; Test Valley: 2.1%; Winchester: 2.1%Babies born at 37 weeks or later under 2,500gFingertips public-health data · 2024 · Named wider-area context
  • Experience of NHS services when the practice was closed: 78.6%Patients rating out-of-hours contact goodGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • General fertility rate: Eastleigh: 57.41 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44; Test Valley: 58 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44; Winchester: 46.98 per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44Live births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 44Fingertips public-health data · 2018 - 22 · Named wider-area context
  • Adults who smoke: Eastleigh: 8.6%; Test Valley: 7.4%; Winchester: 7.0%Adults 18 and over who currently smokeFingertips public-health data · 2022 - 24 · Named wider-area context
  • Survey response rate at the nearest practice: 39.6%Questionnaires returned as a share of those sentGP Patient Survey 2026 · 2026 · Representative location
  • Physically active adults: Eastleigh: 74.1%; Test Valley: 73.5%; Winchester: 74.8%Adults meeting the recommended activity levelFingertips public-health data · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Out of work benefit claimants: Eastleigh: 2.2%; Test Valley: 1.9%; Winchester: 2.1%Working-age people claiming an out-of-work benefitFingertips public-health data · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Fuel poverty: Eastleigh: 7.1%; Test Valley: 8.8%; Winchester: 9.6%Households on the low income, low energy efficiency measureFingertips public-health data · 2023 · Named wider-area context
  • Fluoride concentration: 0.09 mg/l FAverage fluoride in your water company's published regulatory samplesDrinking-water quality provider data · 2016–2025, varying by company · Representative location
  • Nitrate concentration: 31.25 mg/l NO3Average nitrate in your water company's published regulatory samplesDrinking-water quality provider data · 2016–2025, varying by company · Representative location
  • Chlorine or other disinfectant result: 0.52 mg/lAverage free residual disinfectant in your water company's published samplesDrinking-water quality provider data · 2016–2025, varying by company · Representative location
  • Lead test result: 0.83 µg/l PbAverage lead in your water company's published regulatory samplesDrinking-water quality provider data · 2016–2025, varying by company · Representative location
  • Life satisfaction: Eastleigh: 7.82 score out of 10; Test Valley: 7.9 score out of 10; Winchester: 7.72 score out of 10Average rating by adults aged 16 and over, from 0 not at all satisfied to 10 completely satisfiedPersonal wellbeing estimates · 2022/23 · Named wider-area context
  • Happiness: Eastleigh: 7.29 score out of 10; Test Valley: 7.47 score out of 10; Winchester: 7.2 score out of 10Average rating of happiness yesterday by adults aged 16 and over, from 0 to 10Personal wellbeing estimates · 2022/23 · Named wider-area context
  • Anxiety: Eastleigh: 3.46 score out of 10; Test Valley: 3.14 score out of 10; Winchester: 3.43 score out of 10Average rating of anxiety yesterday by adults aged 16 and over, from 0 not at all anxious to 10 completely anxiousPersonal wellbeing estimates · 2022/23 · Named wider-area context
  • Life worthwhile: Eastleigh: 7.72 score out of 10; Test Valley: 7.91 score out of 10; Winchester: 7.97 score out of 10Average rating that the things adults do in life are worthwhile, from 0 to 10Personal wellbeing estimates · 2022/23 · Named wider-area context
  • Adults living with obesity: Eastleigh: 27.3%; Test Valley: 24.4%; Winchester: 19.4%Estimated percentage of adults aged 18 and over classified as living with obesityAdult obesity prevalence · 2024/25 · Named wider-area context
  • Disability: Highest — Eastleigh 006D: 22.7%; Median: 13.6%; Lowest — Test Valley 014E: 9.5%Published information about disability for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas
  • Self-reported general health: Very good: 717; Good: 649; Fair: 247; Bad: 50; Very bad: 17Published information about self-reported general health for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Unpaid carers: Highest — Test Valley 012D: 9.7%; Median: 8.1%; Lowest — Eastleigh 006I: 5.5%Published information about unpaid carers for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Range across local neighbourhood areas

Transport & getting around

  • Commuting method: Car or van (driving): 351; Work at or from home: 306; On foot: 54; Bus, minibus or coach: 8; Train: 7; Underground, metro, tram: 0; Car or van (passenger): 20; Bicycle: 12; Taxi: 3; Motorcycle or scooter: 5; Other: 7Published information about commuting method for the local neighbourhood.Census 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location
  • Access to a major town or city: Nearer to a major town or cityONS nearer/further classification based on modelled driving timeUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · ONS towns classification, May 2026 · Published town figure
  • Nearest bus stop: 200 mStraight-line distance to the closest stopNational Public Transport Access Nodes (NaPTAN) · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Bus stops: 20Straight-line distance to the closest stationNational Public Transport Access Nodes (NaPTAN) · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Nearest railway station: 650 mStraight-line distance to the closest stationNational Public Transport Access Nodes (NaPTAN) · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Which A road is nearest: A335 (Leigh Road)By number, and by name where OS record oneOS Open Roads · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Distance to the nearest A road: 1.1 kmStraight-line distance to the carriagewayOS Open Roads · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Distance to the nearest motorway: 650 mStraight-line distance to the carriagewayOS Open Roads · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Nearest motorway junction: 1.1 kmWhere the motorway network can actually be joinedOS Open Roads · 2026-04 · Representative location
  • Estimated entries and exits at the nearest station: Chandlers Ford: Chandlers FordOver the most recent published yearEstimates of station usage · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Estimated interchanges at the nearest station: Chandlers Ford: Chandlers FordPassengers changing trains without leaving the stationEstimates of station usage · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Station-usage trend: Chandlers Ford: Chandlers Ford, 2023-24 to 2024-25Between the two most recent published yearsEstimates of station usage · 2024-25 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest employment centre by public transport or walking: 9.68 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Reported injury collisions: 45Over the five years of data we holdSTATS19 road safety open data · 2021 to 2025 · Representative location
  • Fatal collisions: 0Collisions in which someone diedSTATS19 road safety open data · 2021 to 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest employment centre by cycle: 8.32 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest employment centre by car: 7.45 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Serious injury collisions: 12On the Department for Transport's adjusted basisSTATS19 road safety open data · 2021 to 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest primary school by public transport or walking: 5.61 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Pedestrian casualties: 9People on foot injured in reported collisionsSTATS19 road safety open data · 2021 to 2025 · Representative location
  • Cyclist casualties: 6People on bicycles injured in reported collisionsSTATS19 road safety open data · 2021 to 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest primary school by cycle: 7.29 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest primary school by car: 6.87 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest secondary school by public transport or walking: 14.43 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest secondary school by cycle: 11.82 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest secondary school by car: 9.23 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest further education college by public transport or walking: 29.81 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest further education college by cycle: 20.61 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Nearest Department for Transport (DfT) traffic count point: A C-class road, 500 m awayThe road link traffic is counted on, and how far away it isRoad traffic statistics · 2025 · Representative location
  • Distance to the nearest count point: 500 mStraight-line distance to the counted roadRoad traffic statistics · 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest further education college by car: 14.31 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Annual average daily motor vehicles: 13,314 vehicles a day on a C-class road (2009 figure)On the nearest counted road linkRoad traffic statistics · 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest GP surgery by public transport or walking: 7.21 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Heavy goods vehicles a day: 267 HGVs a day on a C-class road (2009 figure)On the nearest counted road linkRoad traffic statistics · 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest GP surgery by cycle: 8.03 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • How the traffic figure was produced: Counted on a C-class road in 2009Counted on the road that year, or estimated from an earlier countRoad traffic statistics · 2025 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest GP surgery by car: 7.06 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest hospital by public transport or walking: 44.05 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest hospital by cycle: 36.81 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest hospital by car: 22.09 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest food store by public transport or walking: 6.96 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest food store by cycle: 7.7 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest food store by car: 6.96 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest town centre by public transport or walking: 9.02 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest town centre by cycle: 8.33 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest town centre by car: 7.89 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2019Journey Time Statistics · 2019 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest pharmacy by cycle: 7.56 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2015Journey Time Statistics · 2015 · Representative location
  • Journey time to nearest pharmacy by car: 7.01 minutesModelled for a representative weekday, 2015Journey Time Statistics · 2015 · Representative location
  • Public electric vehicle (EV) chargers in the local authority: Eastleigh: 167; Test Valley: 160; Winchester: 289Reported operational at the quarter endPublic EV charging infrastructure statistics · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Rapid and ultra-rapid chargers (50 kW and above): Eastleigh: 35; Test Valley: 62; Winchester: 108The subset able to charge in minutes rather than hoursPublic EV charging infrastructure statistics · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Public electric vehicle (EV) chargepoints per 100,000 people: Eastleigh: 116.838; Test Valley: 118.342; Winchester: 213.077Chargers per head of the local authority populationPublic EV charging infrastructure statistics · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Change in public electric vehicle (EV) chargers over the quarter: Eastleigh: 4.4%; Test Valley: 3.9%; Winchester: 5.5%Against the previous quarter in the same seriesPublic EV charging infrastructure statistics · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Roadworks permitted: 173In the twelve months to the latest archiveStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Rapid and ultra-rapid chargers per 100,000 people: Eastleigh: 24.487; Test Valley: 45.858; Winchester: 79.62750 kW and above, per head of the local authority populationPublic EV charging infrastructure statistics · 2026-07 · Named wider-area context
  • Roadworks under way at the latest archive date: 0Started and not finished when the archive was cutStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Roadworks permitted but not yet started: 4Due to begin after the latest archive dateStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest roadworks: 50 mClosest works permitted in the last twelve monthsStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Who is carrying out the nearest works: SCOTTISH AND SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION (SSEPD)The promoter named on the permitStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest works: start date: 15 Oct 2025Actual where reported, otherwise proposedStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest works: end date: 21 Oct 2025Actual where reported, otherwise proposedStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest works: what is being done: Utility repair and maintenance works — Immediate - urgentActivity type and permit categoryStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Nearest works: traffic management: Give and takeWhat the permit allowed on the roadStreet Manager roadworks open data · 2026-07 · Representative location
  • Distance travelled to work: Under 2 km: 83; 2 to under 5 km: 43; 5 to under 10 km: 126; 10 to under 20 km: 71; 20 to under 30 km: 19; 30 to under 40 km: 12; 40 to under 60 km: 7; 60 km and over: 2; Works mainly from home: 306; No fixed workplace or other: 104Employed residents by straight-line workplace-distance bandCensus 2021 · Census 2021 · Representative location

Shops, food & amenities

  • Food businesses: 128Premises inspected under the food hygiene schemeFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Rated food businesses: 72Premises registered for food hygiene inspectionFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Premises rated 5: 85Businesses holding the top food hygiene ratingFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Share rated 5: 79.3%Of premises with a current ratingFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Nearest restaurant or cafe: 400 mStraight-line distance to the closest rated premisesFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Restaurants and cafes: 13Straight-line distance to the closest rated premisesFood Hygiene Rating Scheme · 2026-10-02 · Representative location
  • Nearest supermarket: 350 mTo the closest shop mapped as a supermarketOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of supermarkets: 2About a twelve-minute walkOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest convenience shop: 550 mTo the closest corner shop or general storeOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of convenience shops: 4Corner shops and general storesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest pharmacy: 500 mTo the closest dispensing pharmacyOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of pharmacies: 2Dispensing pharmaciesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest doctor or clinic: 450 mTo the closest surgery or clinic on the mapOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Doctors and clinics: 2Surgeries and clinics on the mapOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest hospital: 1.6 kmTo the closest site mapped as a hospitalOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of hospitals: 3Hospital sites of any kindOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest dentist: 400 mTo the closest dental surgeryOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of dentists: 2Dental surgeriesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest vet: 400 mTo the closest veterinary surgeryOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of vets: 1Veterinary surgeriesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest school: 150 mTo the edge of the closest school siteOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of schools: 8All phases and sectors togetherOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest nursery or childcare: 650 mTo the closest nursery or childcare premisesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of nurseries and childcare: 1Nurseries, pre-schools and childcare premisesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest Post Office: 500 mTo the closest branch or counterOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of Post Offices: 1Branches and countersOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest bank: 2.3 kmTo the closest bank branchOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of banks: 0Bank branchesOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest ATM: 400 mTo the closest free-standing cash machineOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of ATMs: 1Free-standing cash machines onlyOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest pub: 450 mTo the closest premises mapped as a pubOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of pubs: 4About a twelve-minute walkOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest restaurant: 350 mTo the closest sit-down restaurantOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of restaurants: 9Sit-down restaurants onlyOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest cafe: 400 mTo the closest cafe or coffee shopOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of cafes: 6Cafes and coffee shopsOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest park: 650 mTo the edge of the closest mapped parkOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of parks: 2Land mapped as a parkOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest playground: 150 mTo the edge of the closest mapped playgroundOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of playgrounds: 11Including school playgroundsOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest gym: 1.0 kmTo the closest fitness centreOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of gyms: 1Fitness centresOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest leisure centre: 1.6 kmTo the closest sports centre or leisure centreOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of leisure centres: 0Sports and leisure centresOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest library: 450 mTo the closest library buildingOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of libraries: 1Including libraries not open to the publicOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest place of worship: 350 mTo the closest building of any religionOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of places of worship: 5Every religion togetherOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest petrol station: 550 mTo the closest fuel forecourtOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of petrol stations: 1Fuel forecourtsOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Nearest mapped electric vehicle (EV) charging station: 1.6 kmTo the closest charging site on the mapOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Count of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations: 0Charging sites, not connectorsOpenStreetMap · 2026-08-23 · Representative location
  • Water supplier: Southern WaterThe company appointed to supply water to this postcodeWater and sewerage undertaker boundaries · April 2024 (Ofwat v1_5) · Representative location
  • Wastewater and sewerage provider: Southern WaterThe company appointed to provide sewerage services hereWater and sewerage undertaker boundaries · April 2024 (Ofwat v1_5) · Representative location
  • Water-company leakage performance: -4.4%How much your water company has cut leakage since its 2019-20 baselineWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Supply interruptions: 81.56 minutesAverage minutes of water supply lost per property last year, across your water companyWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Sewer flooding performance: 2.57 per 10,000 connectionsHomes flooded internally by sewage per 10,000 connections, across your sewerage companyWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Pollution incidents: 58.9 per 10,000 kmPollution incidents per 10,000 km of sewer, across your sewerage companyWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Customer satisfaction: 66.87 scoreYour water company's C-MeX score, Ofwat's customer measure of experienceWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Performance against targets: 41.3%The share of its 2020-25 promises to Ofwat that your water company metWater Company Performance Report 2023-24 (open data) · Financial year 2023-24 · Representative location
  • Highest local visitor-to-resident ratio: 1.1Maximum ratio among the LSOAs within the townUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · November 2024 to November 2025 · Published town figure
  • Typical local visitor-to-resident ratio: 0.3Median ratio among the LSOAs within the townUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · November 2024 to November 2025 · Published town figure
  • Visitor pattern: less visited visitor to resident profileONS profile based on the distribution of local visitor-to-resident quintilesUnderstanding towns in England and Wales, investigating socioeconomic trends · November 2024 to November 2025 · Published town figure